IBJNews

NFL borrows from Indy's Super Bowl playbook

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The NFL is taking a play from Indianapolis’ 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee.

League officials said a Super Bowl Village like the one in downtown Indianapolis for this year's event will now be a requirement for future cities hosting the big game.

And that’s not all. The NFL also is telling host-city candidates that they’ll need some type of central attraction akin to Indianapolis’ massively popular zip line.

“We take this as a compliment that the NFL is trying to replicate what we’ve done,” said Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee CEO Allison Melangton. (Here's a video from IBJ's trip down the zip line; the story continues below.)



The next three cities to host the Super Bowl—New Orleans, New York and Phoenix—already have contacted Indianapolis host committee officials for advice and guidance.

“Although we’ve held this event many times before, Indianapolis broke a lot of ground and we’re learning many things from them,” said Jay Cicero, executive director of New Orleans’ host committee.

Frank Supovitz, NFL senior vice president of events, said the aim is to have “a zone where the Super Bowl lives.”

No longer, NFL officials added, will it be good enough to have scattered hot spots where Super Bowl parties, events and activities take place.

The central celebration area the NFL now wants should be a place that draws Super Bowl fans together and also be an ideal place for the league’s sponsors and partners to be showcased, Supovitz said.

The area between the Indiana Convention Center and Bankers Life Fieldhouse was closed to traffic in the days preceding this year's Super Bowl and set up as a village similar to those seen at recent Olympic Games.

More than 1.1 million people visited the downtown village along Georgia Street and Capitol Avenue during the week of the Feb. 5 Super Bowl, spilling into area stores, restaurants and bars and onto city streets where 70 musical acts and various other activities took place.

Indianapolis’ village setup was in stark contrast to most of the 45 preceding Super Bowls, where about the only place local fans and visitors would come together at one time in the host city was the stadium and surrounding parking lots on game day.

Local fans and visitors praised the various entertainment options in the Super Bowl Village, and sponsors such as Bud Light and Verizon raved about the significant exposure they got there.

NFL officials said Melangton’s previous experience working at Olympic Games along with host committee Chairman Mark Miles' experience working international tennis events as the ATP Tour CEO was key in bringing some key new elements to this year’s Super Bowl.

Melangton isn’t surprised the NFL wants to copy some of Indianapolis’ ideas, but said credit deserves to be spread around.

“I think we helped the NFL redefine what an urban Super Bowl can be,” Melangton said.

In addition to Miles, Melangton said key to coming up with and executing the idea of the Super Bowl village were Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick, Indiana Sports Corp. executive Susan Baughman, Ratio Architects Inc. CEO Bill Browne, Pacers Sports & Entertainment Chief Operating Officer Rick Fuson, Innovative Edit President Conrad Piccirillo, Linger Group Productions Inc. CEO Terry Lingner and Shiel Sexton CEO Mike Dilts.

“All these folks are big thinkers and pushed the discussions to make the plan for the village all that it could be,” Melangton said, adding that Swarbrick was especially instrumental in “pushing us on our thinking.”

Once the group developed the village plan in late 2007 and early 2008, Dilts and Fuson, along with Bingham McHale partner Sue Beesley, were charged with executing the plan. Shiel Sexton loaned the host committee an employee, Shawn Hitchcock, for two years to build the village piece by piece.

Melangton said there are two reasons it won’t be easy for other host cities to replicate Indianapolis’ Super Bowl Village. First, Melangton said, the layout of cities like New York, Dallas and Miami could make it difficult to create “a center of energy.”

But Melangton thinks other host cities may have a bigger challenge.

“We are very fortunate here that we have a lot of people here who have been to a lot of big events, have a lot of diversified experience and a lot of great ideas,” Melangton said. “We have a collection of people who are really innovative thinkers that I think is going to be difficult to replicate.”






 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Let's Think Big
    Let's get the same team thinking big about downtown development, not just events, not just sports facilities.
  • What will Allison do to ISC?
    It will be interesting to see what Allison Melangton does with the Indiana Sport Corp when she takes over as president in the fall from Susan Williams. I hope she 'll use some of the same innovative thinking with the ISC as she did with the Super Bowl.
  • SWarBrick Effect
    My daughter was relating to me that in Desi Arnaz's book about "I Love Lucy" he was alway pushing the directors about certain scenes and always asking "Why not?". The point? Decision making research says you need someone like a Jack Swarbrick playing devil's advocate to get great to decisions. Nice job folks. Thank goodness you had the guts and moxy to keep Jack in your camp.
  • So Proud
    I'm not a huge sports fan, but this makes me so proud! I LOVE the fact Indianapolis is being cast as a leader and innovator. Hopefully more bold ideas for the city will follow.
  • Lets replicate this for other events
    I hope the city would consider something like this for future events such as the Final Four. While not to the scale of the Super Bowl, having a Super Bowl village type atmosphere for a few days leading up the the basketball games would be a huge hit with visitors.
  • Wow
    That is awesome. Indianapolis has raised the bar officially by which all future Super Bowls will be judged.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT