IBJNews

Poison pills remain as Lilly shareholder vote falls short

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shareholders of Eli Lilly and Co. failed once again Monday morning to remove the drugmaker’s tough poison-pill provision against unwanted buyers.

The proposal garnered support from owners of 62.4 percent of Lilly's shares. To pass, the proposal needed approval from the owners of 80 percent of Lilly’s shares. The Indianapolis-based drugmaker's annual meeting of shareholders took place Monday morning.

That means Lilly’s corporate bylaws still contain an 80-percent approval threshold for hostile takeover bids, even after the company’s board has recommended removing the 27-year-old policy in each of the past three years.

The proposal that failed Monday would have required just a bare majority of shareholder votes to approve key moves commonly used in hostile takeovers.

In the past two years, the same proposal received 74 percent and 73 percent of all shares, respectively.

The supermajority vote requirement dates from the 1980s, the heyday of “corporate raiders” making unsolicited bids to buy public companies. Lilly’s board, which has been fiercely independent during multiple waves of consolidation in the pharmaceutical industry, began to support the removal of the high threshold in 2010.

That decision followed three straight years in which a majority of Lilly shareholders expressed support for removing the supermajority voting requirements.

In Lilly’s proxy statement filed March 5, its board members noted that Indiana law would still give Lilly significant protections against unwanted takeovers. Indiana has some of the highest hurdles in the country for slowing down and thwarting hostile takeovers.

Investors typically favor low barriers to hostile takeovers because an acquiring company almost always pays a premium price to entice shareholders to approve such mergers. But the votes of the past two years were hindered because the owners of 13 percent or more shares did not vote on the measure.

Some investors suggest Lilly could be vulnerable to a takeover soon because its major patents expired late last year on its best-selling drug, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, allowing cheaper generic copies to rapidly drain the medicine’s $5 billion in annual revenue.

Zyprexa was the second in a string of five blockbuster Lilly drugs that lose patent protection between 2010 and 2014, sapping the company of more than $10 billion in annual revenue.

Lilly’s research-and-development efforts have produced little new revenue since a string of drugs was launched from 2002 to 2004. Investors are hoping a new Alzheimer’s drug, solanezumab, pans out and becomes a huge seller.

Lilly CEO John Lechleiter has repeatedly rejected the notion of a mega-merger, and he has constantly argued that Lilly’s pipeline eventually will start producing new drugs—and badly needed revenue.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Do the right thing
    Inland Steel was taken over in the 1990's. The steel company was profitable. The cash flow from Inland was parlayed into one of the largest steel conglomerates in the world. The new owner from India replaced American executives with his own. In other words, the executives that made it possible become unemployed. The company did well. The American's employed did not. What is the right thing to do?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.

ADVERTISEMENT