IBJNews

UPS plans $10 million upgrade on northwest side

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

United Parcel Service Inc. is planning a $10 million modernization project for a regional transportation hub in Indianapolis and is seeking tax incentives to help make it happen.

The shipping and logistics company said the project will ensure the viability of the West 81st Street facility on the northwest side of Indianapolis and allow it to retain 750 workers earning an average wage of $30.79 an hour. No additional jobs will be created by the project.

UPS is requesting a five-year tax abatement from the city that will save the company an estimated $276,404 to help offset the cost of the investment.

UPS said the cost per package handled at the facility is greater than similar operations in neighboring states and its needs the improvements to stay competitive.

“If this modernization were not undertaken, UPS would need to consider other locations or route packages through an alternative, more cost-effective hub,” states an analysis by the Department of Metropolitan Development staff, which recommends approval of the abatement.

The abatement request is to be heard Wednesday by the Metropolitan Development Commission.

The requested abatement amounts to a 64-percent property tax savings over five years. UPS would still pay $152,000 in taxes on the new logistics and distribution equipment during the abatement period.

After the tax abatement expires, UPS would pay an estimated additional $64,380 in personal property taxes annually related to the new equipment.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 2.75%
    I don't see UPS bailing on such a project if they don't get a tax abatement that is less than the 3% of the project's cost. Wonder if there is already a precedent for this type of request to the Metropolitan Develop Commission. Seems tantamount to blackmail - give us this tax abatement or we'll close up shop.
  • hooray!
    oh goody more corporate welfare for EVERYBODY!!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT