City plans bid on 2018 Super Bowl

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City and state officials announced Wednesday morning that the city of Indianapolis will bid to host the Super Bowl in 2018.

"I have four words for you: 'Let's do it again,' Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard said at a press conference at Lucas Oil Stadium.

Officials likely are emboldened by the financial results of Indianapolis’ first time hosting of the NFL championship game in February, which produced a direct economic impact of $176 million, according to a study by Rockport Analytics commissioned by the Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee.

Allison Melangton, who led the previous effort, will also be in charge of the next effort, officials said.

The next Super Bowl without a chosen host is in 2016. But Mark Miles, chairman of the Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee, said a few more NFL stadiums are expected to be built by then, and the 2016 game is likely to go to a city with a new venue.

“The reaction we received from the league itself and its owners was glowing,” Mikes said before the announcement. “By every measure I know about, subjective or objective, Super Bowl XLVI was an enormous success.”

When considering “supply chain” spending by businesses to stock up for the game, in addition to spending of extra wages on overtime, the $176 million impact figure rises to $277.9 million, according to the study.

Other findings from the study showed that 116,000 visitors outside Indianapolis came to the city for the game or related events, and the NFL Experience drew 265,000 visitors.

That drove area hotel occupancy rates to about 93 percent for the four days leading up to the game, and to an eye-popping 99 percent for downtown hotels. The strong capacity lifted daily room rates to $290.
For each dollar visitors spent, about 84 cents stayed in the city, according to the study.

“Those are the kind of numbers I like to hear,” Ballard said at the press conference before announcing the city’s bid. (For a quick recap of local Super Bowl festivities during the weeks prior to the big game, see the video below.)

A decision on the 2018 game likely would be made at the 2014 team owners’ meeting, Miles said. A bid would need to be put together by the end of 2013 or early 2014, which gives the city roughly 18 months to submit its next attempt.

That would give donors to the Super Bowl a two-year break from contributing more money to land the event. Overall, 133 donors gave roughly $28 million toward Super Bowl XLVI. About $1.8 million of that money sits in reserve. The host committee has voted to make the money available should the city pursue another NFL championship, Miles said.

“While we didn’t make them sign pledge forms,” Miles said of the donors, “they were pervasively positive about going after another one.”

Indianapolis Colts Senior Vice President Pete Ward said the city has received a lot of encouragement to bid for a future Super Bowl, much of it coming immediately after the game ended.

“The feedback we’ve gotten from almost anyone inside and outside the league is that this game in Indianapolis was just outstanding in every way,” Ward said. “There’s a lot of momentum for Indianapolis right now.”

The opinions that matter the most are those of the NFL’s 32 team owners, who vote on Super Bowl host cities. Ward said he and Colts owner Jim Irsay have heard “nothing but positives” from team owners about the job Indianapolis did hosting the Super Bowl this year.

But, Ward added, “nothing is guaranteed.”

Indianapolis will need to address concerns about a lack of hotel space downtown. While owners raved about much of the city, complaints surfaced about a lack of prime hotel space for the league’s biggest sponsors. Putting off the bid until 2018, league sources said, would give Indianapolis officials time to develop another large downtown hotel, possibly on the site of the Pan Am Plaza.

The 2013 Super Bowl is set for New Orleans; the 2014 game is scheduled for New York; and the 2015 event is set for Glendale, Ariz.

Other findings from the study showed that the Super Bowl generated $88.6 million in tax dollars, including $42.7 million in federal taxes, $24.9 million in state taxes and $21 million in local taxes.

It also created the equivalent of 3,600 direct full-time jobs and 2,000 indirect full-time jobs.
Local businesses undoubtedly benefitted from the influx. As an example, Melangton pointed out at the press conference that the downtown Steak n Shake served 31,000 hamburger patties during the week of the game and Scotty’s Brewhouse blew through 65,000 chicken wings.


  • To busy to host College NCG?
    In the middle of the middle of the night last night some, I think, troubling news came across the the news (wire?). Officials here made a very public announcement that Indy would not pursue the college NCG, at least not now. Siting to may events in the pipeline right now. This comes after press across the country very publicly had Indy as one of the five top locations in the mix to get this event. This is the second time something like this has happened in recent years. The Sports Corp. ( I believe it was them, someone correct me if I am wrong) pulled out of the running to bring the headquarters of USA Basketball to Indianapolis. Once again they sited to busy as the cause. We built any awful expensive stadium and have invested 30+ years in the Sports Strategy as an economis development tool. If it is staffing issues, I would like to have this addressed now. New Orleans certainly doesn't have a problem hosting multiple events in a year, in-spite of it's weakened city at this point in time. We have come along way to hear this kind of news from the city.
  • John Anthony
    I really really really LOVED the Intercontinental Hotel. It was such a beautiful design... Personally I thought it was better than JW Marriott.
  • Take it easy, Indy
    I think a few compliments have gone to this city's head. Didn't the city end up losing over $1,000,000 on this year's Super Bowl? Exactly what benefits did we reap? I live and work downtown and the inconvenience was unreal. There are bigger problems to address (for instance, whenever it rains the crappy non-reflective lines painted on the street become invisible)
  • Another large hotel?
    If its the site of Pan Am Plaza, maybe they can resurrect the Intercontinental plans. The real question is whether the market can support another large hotel throughout the rest of the year. That remains to be seen with the new convention center just now coming online.
  • Wrong amount of chicks!
    Ooooops, 32,500 chickens.
  • Wings!
    That would be 32,000 chickens in my book! Cluckity Cluck!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.