IBJNews

Developers taking serious look at former GM site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Developers are still trying to determine whether the city's vision for an urban village at the former General Motors plant near downtown Indianapolis would be profitable, said an official with the trust charged with cleaning up and marketing the site.

“I wish we were further along,” said Bruce Rasher, redevelopment manager for the Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust, based in Ypsilanti, Mich. “On the other hand, I’m very encouraged we’ve been able to attract the interest of capable and reputable developers.”

RACER Trust Cleanup Manager Robert Hare visited Indianapolis this week to bring local stakeholders up to date on the environmental assessment of the 101-acre property, which was the site of a metal-stamping factory until June 2011.

Mayor Greg Ballard initially hoped to attract another industrial user that might bring jobs, but this year the emphasis shifted to creating a new, mixed-use neighborhood, as an Urban Land Institute advisory panel recommended last year.

In an interview Wednesday, Rasher said at least six reputable developers, both local and national, have toured the property since 2011. Of those, two are taking a serious look at the feasibility of the Urban Land Institute’s vision. Led by former Mayor William Hudnut, the advisory panel interviewed more than 75 local people about what they wanted to see on the site.

The 82-year-old plant, at 340 S. White River Parkway,  is near Lucas Oil Stadium, Rasher noted, and it has more than a quarter mile of White River frontage.

“It’s just a matter of time before the river really becomes a significant amenity,” Rasher said.

Given those factors, the site is drawing more serious interest from developers than three-quarters of the properties under management by the RACER Trust, Rasher said. The trust was created on March 31, 2011, out of a bankruptcy court settlement with the 14 states where GM closed plants. The trust is marketing 89 properties and has sold 19.

Environmental assessments at the local site and surrounding area will be finished this year, Hare said. The trust already knows that soil contamination is limited to the west end of the site, where a former chemical distribution facility stood. "A good three-quarters of the property is available and ready for redevelopment now," he said.

It will take years to clean up the soil and groundwater in the surrounding neighborhood, Hare said. Those costs will be paid by the trust, which will continue its work long after the property is sold.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Possiblities
    This would be a great place to expand the Indianapolis Zoo or dedicate 20 to 30 percent of the land to nature wildlife since its next the river. This site has been a hazard to Indianapolis site it was opened and it would be amazing to see plants, scrubs and other natural life on it. I understand some of it will need to be developed to cover cost but let's give a little back.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT