KAR Auction Services mum on leveraged buyout talk

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based KAR Auction Services Inc. isn’t commenting on a report by Reuters that it is talking with private equity firms about taking the company private for the third time in its 30-year history.

Private equity firms including Kelso & Co. and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners still own about 74 percent of the nation’s second-largest used vehicle auction chain.

Publicly traded KAR’s principal businesses are used-car auction company Adesa Inc., salvage-vehicle auction firm Insurance Auto Auctions Inc. and Automotive Finance Corp., which helps dealers finance vehicle purchases.

KAR has a market value of $2.3 billion. It posted profit of $72.2 million on $1.9 billion in revenue in 2011.

On Wednesday, KAR shares jumped to $18.36, their highest since May, after Reuters reported the company may be contemplating a leveraged buyout, and then fell. Shares were trading at $17.18 at midday Friday, up 6 cents on the day.

Reuters, citing sources close to the discussion, said Kelso & Co. and KAR’s other chief equity holders had reached out to other buyout firms to discuss a sale.

Kelso, Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, ValueAct Capital and Parthenon Capital took KAR private in 2007.

The auto auction industry has struggled in recent years with the economic downturn that dashed new car sales. That meant fewer new cars coming off lease to auction.

KAR shares peaked just above $20 in mid-2011.

Existing private equity holdings might be figuring,”Hey, let’s get our money out” now, said Mark Foster, chief investment officer at Columbus-based Kirr Marbach & Co.

The expectation of higher capital gains taxes next year has been driving such deal talk, as well, he noted.

Fundamentally, as a public company, “it’s not like they [KAR] need capital” right now, Foster said.

KAR might not fetch as much these days as before, according to a report issued Thursday by Barclays Capital.

Historical merger-and-acquisition multiples in the auto auction industry have been in the range of nine to 10 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, said Barclays. Private equity “is unlikely to pay similar valuation for auto auctions today given the declining volumes in the overall industry,” the investment firm said.

At a more reasonable eight to 10 times EBITDA, KAR’s value is more like $16 to $25 a share, and “we see lower end,” Barclay's said.

Barclays was pessimistic KAR would find bidders from within the industry because big players already have a sizeable presence in the respective businesses, and because of antitrust issues.

KAR predecessor ADESA  first went public in 1992. Three years later it was snapped up by the parent of Minnesota Power & Light, known as ALLETE.

In 2004, ALLETE spun off the remaining shares to the public. The company was taken private again in 2007 when KAR was formed by Kelso and the other equity partners.

They took KAR public in 2009 at about $12 a share, raising $313 million.

Atlanta-based Manheim Inc. is the only auto auction company bigger than KAR by volume of trade.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.