IBJNews

State’s unemployment rate rises to 8.3 percent

IBJ Staff
September 21, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s unemployment rate climbed to 8.3 percent in August, marking the third straight month the rate has increased.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Friday morning that the rate increased from 8.2 percent in July. It was 8 percent in June.

The rate is higher than the national rate of 8.1 percent.

Indiana’s jobless rate has been at 8 percent or above in all but two month since December 2008. It was 9.3 percent a year ago.

Indiana added 11,000 private-sector jobs in August, the 10th straight month the state has reported an increase. So far this year, the state’s overall job-growth rate of 0.3 percent continues to exceed the national average of 0.1 percent, the state said.

The DWD, however, continues to take issue with how the federal government calculates the state’s unemployment rate.

“Yet another month the federal government has notified us our unemployment rate increased while we added actual jobs,” DWD Commissioner Scott B. Sanders said in a prepared statement. “We have repeatedly questioned their data models. It’s pretty obvious the numbers just don’t add up.”

Statewide non-farm employment in August totaled 3.2 million on a seasonally adjusted basis. A total of 253,393 sought unemployment benefits, down from a revised 264,304 in July.

Sectors showing employment gains in August included private educational and health services (5,200), construction (2,200) and trade transportation and utilities (1,900).

Sectors showing the biggest employment loss were government (2,200), financial activities (1,900), professional and business services (1,800), and manufacturing (1,200).

In the Indianapolis metro area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 7.6 percent in August, down from 8.8 percent in August 2011.

However, the area lost jobs, dropping to 828,040 in August from 833,859 a year earlier.

Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Downward pressure
    Yeah, Brett, the Union model never worked here right? I'm always amazed at folks who root for people to make less money.
  • Waaaa
    Right to work is doing just fine. What happen to all the Union shops in Anderson, New Castle, Muncie, Bedford, Evansville etc. who closed down and moved jobs out of the country before right to work was ever enacted. Cry me a river. This economy and the people of Indiana won't support Union inefficiency, poor quality products and $100,000 Union broom pusher jobs. Good riddance.
  • Unemployment
    So, how's that right-to-work,, Working out for you now? Where's all the jobs,Hmmmm!! I hope all that voted for this Bill, chokes on there unemployment checks!!
    • Mitch our Man
      I am so happy that Mitch is our gov. He has sqaundered the toll money, kept over 8% unemployment, and gave the rich back 500 mill to eliminate the inheratance tax. Oh I forgot he raised the sales tax and took over the control of our local schools. Good luck pu you will need it.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT