IBJNews

Amerigroup delays vote on $4.9B WellPoint acquisition

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Amerigroup Corp. officials agreed to delay a shareholder vote on WellPoint Inc.’s $4.9 billion buyout offer for the managed-care company to resolve investors’ claims they were being shortchanged in the deal, the company said in a securities filing.

Amerigroup will delay the company’s Oct. 9 annual meeting for two weeks and be willing to “receive and consider in good faith any inquiries and superior proposals” to WellPoint’s offer, officials said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday.

The settlement comes more than a month after Angela Braly, Wellpoint’s embattled chairman and CEO, stepped down in the face of shareholder criticism over the health insurer’s performance. John Cannon, WellPoint’s general counsel, is serving as interim CEO while the company searches for a replacement.

Braly, 51, took over the CEO position in June 2007. During her tenure, she became a high-profile foe of President Barack Obama’s health-care overhaul and, more recently, sparked the ire of investors after WellPoint missed earnings estimates and cut its forecast twice in four months.

Maureen McDonald, an Amerigroup spokeswoman, declined in an e-mailed statement to comment beyond the SEC filing on the settlement of investors’ claims. Kristin Bins, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis-based WellPoint, didn’t immediately return a call for comment.

The acquisition, announced July 9, would make WellPoint, the second-largest U.S. health insurer, the largest private provider of Medicaid plans for low-income patients. Amerigroup helps states manage health coverage for the poor.

Amerigroup investors sued the insurer’s board in August alleging directors, along with financial adviser Goldman Sachs Group Inc., put their own interests ahead of shareholders by backing the WellPoint offer.

Goldman Sachs was “hopelessly conflicted” as an adviser on the transaction and pushed the board to ignore a more lucrative deal with a suitor described as Company D, lawyers for the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and the City of Monroe Employees Retirement System in Michigan said in court filings.

While the funds weren’t able to win a financial recovery in the case, Amerigroup and WellPoint officials agreed to cut the so-called breakup fee in the deal by $49 million, according to the SEC filing. That means Amerigroup would have to pay $97 million if WellPoint’s bid is topped instead of $146 million.

Amerigroup and WellPoint officials denied any wrongdoing in connection with the buyout and agreed to the settlement to “avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation,” according to the filing.

Delaware Chief Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine still must decide whether to approve the settlement before it becomes final.

Virginia Beach, Virginia-based Amerigroup on Monday said it would sell its operations in that state to Inova, a not-for-profit health-care system after antitrust questions from the U.S. Justice Department arose on the pending Wellpoint sale.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT