IBJNews

Hostess to cut wages for Indiana bakers in labor deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of Twinkies and Wonderbread, has received the go-ahead from a U.S. bankruptcy court judge to cut wages for thousands of bakery workers, affecting more than 400 employees in Indiana.

Hostess, based in Irving, Texas, on Wednesday won approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York to impose changes to collective-bargaining agreements for members of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers International Union.

Changes to the agreements included an 8 percent decrease in wages for the first year of a five-year contract, according to the company.  Wages would rise about 3 percent the following year. The agreements also would include revised health and welfare benefits, and/or employee cost share.

Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in January. It argued to the bankruptcy court that cutting wages for all workers—including the BCTGM members—was the only way to avoid going out of business.

Members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had ratified similar changes to their collective bargaining agreement with Hostess in September. BCTGM members voted to reject the company’s proposed concessions, leading to the court action.

Hostess employs 874 workers in Indiana, 436 of which are members in the BCTGM union, according to Hostess spokesman Erik Halvorson. The firm employs 288 workers in its Indianapolis bakery, of which 212 are BCTGM members.

In a letter to Hostess workers dated Aug. 20, Rayburn emphasized that all employees—including management—would be subject to the pay cuts absorbed by union members.

“With lower costs, we can attract the financing we need to exit Chapter 11, invest in our operations and create a company with a sustainable long-term future,” Rayburn said.

Hostess was founded in 1930 and has annual revenue of more than $2 billion. It employs about 18,500 workers, which operate 36 bakeries and 570 bakery retail outlets nationwide.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT