IBJNews

Lottery Commission inks contract, losing bidder files protest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosier Lottery officials signed a 15-year contract Friday afternoon with private manager GTECH Indiana, which promises to bring the state $1.76 billion over the first five years of the contract.

Meanwhile, the only other bidder in the landmark outsourcing deal, Scientific Games, has submitted a letter of protest. Games, which is the lottery's largest vendor, complained in the Oct. 5 letter that it was not given an opportunity to give a "best and final" offer even though its bid was only 1.7 percent less than GTECH's. The letter, which asked the lottery commission not to execute a contract with GTECH, said the commission also failed to consider the cost savings that would have come from assigning the lottery contract to an existing vendor.

Indiana will be only the second state, following Illinois, to shift all its lottery operations to a private manager. Lottery officials have generally discussed outsourcing as a can't-lose proposition because the private manager will owe a penalty if it fails to meet the income targets set out in its bid, and the state would share in excess profit.

On Friday, however, lottery spokesman Al Larsen noted that GTECH's penalties and bonuses will be limited to 5 percent of the threshold income, as laid out in the bid. That means the state would miss out on some of the promised income if GTECH under-performs by more than 5 percent.

GTECH's bid documents, released Friday, show the company promised to deliver $256 million in its first full fiscal year of operations, ending June 30, 2014.  Then income is supposed to ramp up to $410 million by 2017 and 2018.

GTECH has not yet laid out its business plan for the remaining 10 years of the contract. The Indiana Lottery Commission will keep control over “significant” business decisions and will approve or reject the company’s business plan each year.

The commission chose GTECH, a subsidiary of the Italian firm Lottomatica, at its Oct. 3 meeting.

GTECH Indiana will be led by Connie Laverty O’Connor, who recently oversaw a consortium of private managers in Illinois and held senior management jobs at lotteries in New York and Georgia. “Working hand-in-hand with the Hoosier Lottery, we will build a world-class team aligned around a common goal, a commitment to delivering incremental revenues to the residents of Indiana,” she said in a prepared statement.

GTECH’s bid documents, released Friday, revealed little about its business plan. Most of the more than 1,600 pages were redacted as "trade secrets," including GTECH's plans for draw games such as Lotto, scratch-off tickets, and much of its retailer expansion strategy. Officials said earlier this month that GTECH wants to broaden the lottery's customer base by expanding sales to grocery stores, big box stores and discount stores.

The lottery and GTECH are keeping confidential the “brand transformation and marketing plan.”

The lottery commission requested bids that didn’t hinge on expanding gaming, which the commission defines as the addition of new games like Keno, or an Internet-based lottery. But lottery providers were encouraged to submit an “enhanced bid” describing the outcome of those options.

Should Indiana want to expand gaming, GTECH says it could produce another $233 million over five years with “monitor games,” which would include Keno.

Adding Internet-based games could bring $23 million over five years, and video lottery terminals could produce $920 million over five years.

Hoosier Lottery brought in about $227 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, and expects to generate $221 million next year. Lottery officials predict that a state-run lottery would bring in $4.2 bilion through 2028 but that the private-sector manager could generate $6.3 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Something Smells
    Why is the Hoosier Lottery sharing any income with a vendor? Is Karl Browning so incompetent that he couldn't sign distribution agreements with big box retailers himself and get 100% of the volume growth for the State of Indiana?
  • How much will this cost?
    I missed the part about how much the company will make to bring in the anticipated amount of revenue, before it gets to split the revenues about the anticipated amount. I can't wait for all the flashing casino lights and bells they will install at the gas stations in their attempts to sell more tickets.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT