IBJOpinion

Rapid rise of ExactTarget uplifting for young techies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Hewlett-Packard Co. famously started in a Silicon Valley garage. Perhaps one day, ExactTarget’s humble beginnings—in $200-a-month space in a Greenfield business park—will be the subject of similar lore.

ExactTarget is no HP, at least not yet. But in just over a decade, the interactive marketer has rocketed from bootstrapped startup to New York Stock Exchange-listed company with a market value of $1.5 billion.

And spend a few minutes around Scott Dorsey, the company’s CEO and co-founder, and it’s clear he believes the company is just getting started. It expects to reach more than $275 million in revenue this year and is shooting for $1 billion, Dorsey told attendees of the Powder Keg tech startup conference Oct. 19.

The company started as a permission-based e-mail marketer, and it remains a leader in that field. But in recent years, it has broadened its marketing offerings beyond e-mail to help clients bond with customers through mobile, social media and websites.

To help establish itself as a one-stop shop for marketing technology needs, ExactTarget unveiled two major acquisitions this month. It paid $96 million for Atlanta-based Pardot LLC, broadening its reach into business-to-business digital marketing, and $21 million for Carmel-based iGoDigital, which helps companies like Amazon and Wal-Mart recommend products to customers based on their personal information, their previous buying habits and their online queries.

The deals brought 150 employees into the ExactTarget fold. The company now has 1,000 employees in Indianapolis and another 500 elsewhere in the United States and as far away as Brazil and Australia.

Dorsey Dorsey

It was just the kind of inspiring story budding tech entrepreneurs in the Powder Keg audience wanted to hear: an Indianapolis-based startup climbing to heights that would be impressive even in the technology hotbed of Silicon Valley.

“We were fortunate,” Dorsey said. “We got off to a fast start and really, really kept going.”

That’s not to say it was easy. Dorsey and co-founders Chris Baggott and Peter McCormick had to rely on friends-and-family funding for the first $200,000. (The group was richly rewarded: A $5,000 investment then now is worth $1 million.) And there was nothing glamorous about those early days. To prove its e-mail software actually worked, the company turned to Greenfield’s Mozzi’s Pizza chain, among other businesses in the area.

Dorsey doesn’t sound like a man who has let success get to his head. “Frankly, one of our strengths is, we just knew there was so much we didn’t know, and we were unbelievably open to feedback,” he said.

He said angel investor Bob Compton, one of ExactTarget’s early backers, was a key mentor, as were venture capitalists who started pumping money into the company in 2004. He said the outside investors “helped crack open our minds that this could be something far bigger than we had conceived of originally.”

Baggott, another Powder Keg speaker, said ExactTarget also benefited from being willing to make tough decisions early on, including replacing a succession of chief technology officers who didn’t work out—a gutsy move considering the founders didn’t have the tech expertise to step in themselves.

And some stumbles actually paid off in the long run. ExactTarget first filed to go public in 2007, but the financial crisis derailed that effort, prompting the company to turn to venture capitalists for additional funding.

It then made big investments in R&D that caused steep losses—a strategy public company investors probably would have punished. But by the time ExactTarget revived its IPO plans late last year, performance was on the upswing—and investors began lining up to buy the stock.

In its preliminary prospectus, ExactTarget projected the shares would fetch $15 to $17 apiece in the IPO. The company ended up pricing them at $19, and when the shares debuted March 22, the first trade was at $23.05.

Dorsey, who rang the opening bell on the New York Stock Exchange that day, recalls the IPO as an exhilarating, “out-of-body experience”—with a little confusion thrown in.

“For weeks, bankers were telling me, ‘Dorsey, you get to buy the first share. You get to buy the first share.’ I kept thinking, “How am I going to pay for it? Do I need to bring cash? Do I need to bring a check?’”

It turned out the purchase was ceremonial, not a real transaction, he said with a laugh.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT