IBJNews

Hostess plant closings so far spare Indy, Columbus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of Wonder bread and Twinkies, said Monday that it is permanently shutting plants in Cincinnati, Seattle and St. Louis because it couldn’t get enough members of its striking bakery workers’ union to cross the picket lines to keep them open.

The company has threatened additional closings but so far hasn’t said that it will shut down its plants in Indianapolis and Columbus, which have joined a nationwide strike against proposed labor contracts that would cut wages 8 percent in the first year of a five-year agreement.

Hostess employs about 875 workers in Indiana, 436 of them members in the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, Hostess spokesman Erik Halvorson said. The firm employs 288 workers in its Indianapolis bakery, 212 of them members of that union.

In a statement, Hostess CEO Gregory Rayburn said: “We will close the entire company if widespread strikes cripple our business,”

The strike affects 23 of Hostess’ 36 plants, the company said. Half the affected plants are operating, the company said.

The company can’t continue operating with so many affected plants, Rayburn said. Hostess is “days away” from having to shut down entirely, he said.

The bakery workers’ union went on strike at some locations, including Indianapolis and Columbus, in reaction to what the union called the “unilateral imposition of a horrendous contract” rejected by 92 percent of the membership.

Drivers represented by the Teamsters Union have ratified a new contract with 8 percent in wage concessions and 17 percent in benefit reductions. The Teamsters are honoring the bakery workers’ picket lines at some locations.

Texas-based Hostess said enough union members are crossing the picket lines to allow “full operations” at about half the struck plants.

“Some employees are apparently under the misimpression that if they force Hostess to liquidate, another company will buy our bakeries and offer them employment,"  Rayburn said in his statement.

The industry has “far too much capacity,” Rayburn said. “I believe the leadership of the bakers union knows this fact, but is willing to sacrifice its Hostess employees for the sake of preventing other bakery companies from asking for similar concessions.”

Hostess is making “false claims” in a “desperate attempt to break our members’ solidarity and scare our members into giving up their fight for their pensions, their health insurance, their wages and their families,” bakery union Secretary-Treasurer Dave Durkee said Monday in a statement.

The bakery workers’ union said it represents 5,000 Hostess workers.

Hostess previously said the bakery workers voted against the contract because they were erroneously told there was a white knight ready to buy the company and avoid wage cuts.

“There is no buyer waiting to purchase the entire company and there never has been,” a Hostess spokesman, Lance Ignon, said in an e-mailed statement.

Teamsters officials couldn’t be reached for comment on the strike.
Hostess filed a bankruptcy reorganization plan last month that can’t be implemented without selling some assets or obtaining new financing. Both the Teamsters and the bakery workers’ union made voluntary concessions in the first Chapter 11 reorganization, which began in 2004.

Hostess filed under Chapter 11 for a second time in January, listing assets of $982 million against liabilities totaling $1.43 billion.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Unions Add Zero Value
    Just another example of how unions drive up costs and eventually lead businesses to no longer be competitive. This is proof, by far the best and most recognizable brand in the industry, and can no longer compete because the union was too stubborn to change. Its not 1925 anymore and competitors will eat you alive if you don't constantly improve. The UAW made concessions - they knew the same thing would have happened to domestic automakers had they not adjusted their beliefs of constant entitlements.
  • Sherman
    You must be a Republician. Always on the side of the company.Were you aware that the company bosses gave them self a big pay bonus and forced their employees to take a pay cut.How would you like to work for them?
    • umbuddah
      Why is it always the unions fault and never a mention of what management is willing to concede?
    • Hostess/Little Debbie
      I stopped buying Hostess because they cost twice as much as Little Debbie, until now I never knew why Hostess cost so much. The economy is in the dumper and unions and government still want more. Unlike the government, the union can't force me to pay more. I wonder why unions don't take over the companies they are determined to run into the ground. Much easier to sit back and collect the monthly dues then send the check to the DNC every two years. I must admit, the unions get a better return on their investment with the DNC then Hostess has gotten from the union. The membership shouldn't worry. Once their jobs are gone they still have the hammock of unemployment insurance and Obama Care, don't forget the food stamps and free Obama phone. How much of that 8% could be recouped by not paying union dues. Cross the line, go back to work. Save your jobs and your self respect.
      • Twinkies are saved!
        Yay! Viva la' Ding Dongs!
      • Stealing the Middle Class
        What is going on is a continuation of the stealing of the middle class in the name of economic competition--an 8% wage cut is just? Hedrick Smith, former New Times editor explains it in his book, "Who Stole the American Dream", for example, since 1978 American productivity has increased 80% but wages only 10%. Corporations took the 70% and are not sharing it--that didnt used to happen. Before '78 wages increased at the same rate. And to make it worse, this is ony happening in America. Not the rest of the world---and our middle class is dying, along with our country. Something has to change or we are finished as a nation.
        • Qu'ils mangent de la brioche
          Get it?

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. What became of this project? Anyone know?

        2. Scott, could you post an enlarged photo of the exterior of the building? This will be a great addition to Walnut Street. This area will only continue to develop with additions like this. Also, please give us more updates on the "Cultural Trail light" expansion. Also a great move for the city, as long as there is maintenance money set aside.

        3. Great story IBJ! Citizens don't have a real sense of the financial magnitude of supporting Indy's sports and tourism sector. The CIB was a brilliant idea for creating a highly integrated public-private partnership to support this sector from the economic activity it generates. Unfortunately, most folks think the benefits of that economic activity accrue directly to the City budget, and it doesn't. So though the CIB is facing lean times (covering its costs while maintaining minimally acceptable reserves), the City is operating with deficit - less tax revenue than expenses each year - with a very fragile reserve balance. That's why it's so challenging for the City to fund basic needs or new intitatives (e.g. pre-k education; new jail), and some credit rating agencies have downgraded Indy from it's past stellar AAA status. More reporting on City finances would be welcomed.

        4. Sure, I'll admit that it bugs me to see that the IBJ.COM censors it's blog posts almost as much as the D of I does when someone points out the falsehoods and fabrications. _____But I think it bothers me almost as much that Captain/Defender/Disciple get his yanked too. You see, those of us with a sense of integrity, humanity, compassion, and a need for fact based opinion WANT to see all of his screeds posted. It makes our point so much better than we can do it ourselves.

        5. We're conflating two very different topics. Voter fraud is a myth and excessive gun violence is all too real. I just hope rational gunowners decide to stop being shouted down by the, well, let's call them "less rational" ones.

        ADVERTISEMENT