IBJNews

IU: Growth of Indiana’s labor force slowing rapidly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The growth of the state’s labor force is expected to slow significantly during the next three decades, predicts the Indiana Business Research Center.

The center at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business on Tuesday released the results of a study it produced for the Indiana Department of Workforce Development.

IU’s research center attributes the slowdown to an increasing number of baby boomers entering retirement and a cresting of the decades-long rise in female labor force participation.

For Hoosier employers, the pullback could present several challenges, said Matt Kinghorn, the business research center’s state demographer.

“Firms in growing fields like health care, business operations and information technology will certainly have to compete for labor,” he sad in a prepared statement. “But even mature industries that will likely grow slowly or even decline in the next couple of decades, including many manufacturers, could still have trouble maintaining an adequate work force because they are more dependent on older workers.”

The slowdown started to emerge  between 2000 and 2010, when Indiana’s labor force grew by roughly 132,000—its smallest 10-year gain since the U.S. Census Bureau began collecting data on labor force size in 1940, the research center said.

It expects the state’s labor force to slow even more, to less than 120,000, in the current decade and essentially flatten between 2020 and 2030 before it begins growing again, albeit slowly.

The projections are quite a contrast to what occurred during the last half of the 20th century, when the baby-boomer generation and a large number of women entered the work force, helping Indiana’s labor force grow an average of 310,000 per decade, the research center said.

The shift is not unique to Indiana but instead reflects a national trend. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, labor force growth around the country slowed to an average annual rate of 0.8 percent last decade compared with 1.6 percent annually between 1950 and 2000.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics expects the rate to slide even further, to 0.6 percent this decade and to 0.4 percent between 2020 and 2030.

In Indiana, seven of the state’s 16 metropolitan areas are expected to match or exceed Indiana’s 0.4-percent average annual growth rate this decade, including the Indianapolis-Carmel area. Its labor force is projected to grow by 1 percent per year this decade, tops in the state.

Other metro areas with relatively high annual projected growth rates through 2020 include Lafayette and the Indiana portion of the Louisville metro area (both 0.6 percent) and Elkhart-Goshen (0.5 percent).

At the other end of the spectrum, Kokomo is expected to suffer the greatest rate of decline (0.6 percent), followed by Anderson (0.4 percent) and Muncie (0.3 percent).
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT