IBJNews

States gain delay on deadline for health-law marketplaces

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

States received an extra month from the Obama administration to decide whether to build online marketplaces for medical insurance after Republican governors pressed their resistance to the president’s health-care law.

Extending a deadline set for Friday, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said states can wait until Dec. 14 to declare whether they’ll build their own insurance exchanges. States that opt out can join a partnership with the federal government or let the U.S. run the markets.

About 9 million Americans are expected to enroll in exchange plans in 2014, rising to 26 million by 2018, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Restrictions in the new markets are expected to crimp profits for insurers like UnitedHealth Group Inc. and WellPoint Inc., so a delay may help the industry, said Ana Gupte, a Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst in New York. Ultimately, insurers would prefer state-run exchanges, she said.

UnitedHealth, the biggest U.S. health insurer, is based in Minnetonka, Minn., and WellPoint, the No. 2 plan, in Indianapolis.

“The industry would prefer the more decentralized approach,” Gupte said. “The more states that rely on the federal fall-back, the less easy it is for the industry to secure any changes through lobbying. They’re much better at lobbying at the state level.”

Exchange regulators will decide which health plans are allowed to sell in the new marketplaces, whether they have to meet standards for coverage already set by the 2010 Affordable Care Act and other issues likely to have a direct impact on profitability for companies, Gupte said. Some states that have gone ahead with their own systems, such as California, plan to negotiate premiums on behalf of consumers, while others will take a “more laissez-fair approach,” she said.

The marketplaces are required under the 2010 overhaul to help people who don’t get insurance from their employer comply with the law’s requirement that they have coverage. Exchanges must open for business by Oct. 1 next year. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia so far have said they will build their own exchanges.

Sebelius, in a letter Thursday to Republican Governors Robert McDonnell of Virginia and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, said her department has “worked closely with governors from across the country to gather their input.”

Nonetheless, she said states would have an extra month to file a letter of intent. Even beyond that, states have until Feb. 15 to join a hybrid state-federal exchange and will have opportunities in future years to start their own markets, Sebelius said.

“States have and will continue to be partners in implementing the health care law, and we are committed to providing states with the flexibility, resources and time they need,” she wrote.

Republican governors have revolted against the law since President Barack Obama’s re-election, with McDonnell, Indiana's Mike Pence, Kansas’ Sam Brownback and Alabama’s Robert Bentley declaring their states wouldn’t create exchanges. Governors in Texas and South Carolina said Thursday they’ll opt out as well.

“It is clear that putting in place the new programs you championed will be an enormous strain on state governments and budgets, as well as the federal government,” Jindal and McDonnell, the chairman of the Republican Governors Association, said in a Nov. 14 letter to Obama requesting a delay in the notification deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT