IBJNews

Indiana considers private firm for final I-69 legs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is considering hiring a private firm to design and build the stretch of Interstate 69 from Bloomington to Martinsville.

The state Department of Transportation posted a request for information Tuesday asking companies to tell the state how they could plan and build that segment of the highway, and maintain it once it's built.

The move comes as the state seeks ways to pay for the final segments of the 142-mile project designed to link Indianapolis and Evansville. The first three sections from Evansville to Crane are open, and a fourth segment to Bloomington is under construction.

But money from the state's lease of the Indiana Toll Road, which was used to jumpstart construction of the I-69 extension, is either spent or allocated to specific projects, and the state must find a way to pay for the final two sections of the highway.

The section still to be built is expected to cost between $350 million and $500 million, the Evansville Courier & Press reported.

The state's request for information says Indiana is looking at "various public-private partnership delivery models" for the project.

INDOT spokesman Will Wingfield said that even if a contractor takes charge of the entire project, the state is still determined to bar tolls on the road.

"There is no change in our commitment that motorists will be able to drive from Indianapolis to Evansville without paying a toll," Wingfield said.

He said the state believes it would get a better price by agreeing to pay a lump sum to the contractor than by bonding out the work.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wrong on nearly all accounts
    Joe: Actually -- the cost of the roadway has come in UNDER budget; the project meets all required standards; there ARE a variety of potential funding sources that can be used for the final portions of the project -- and yes, you are correct -- there will not be a need for tolls to be used to pay for the final segments. This project is good for Indiana and will help increase the accessibility of Indianapolis as we will soon have interstates reaching outward in 8 directions across the country - plus the upgraded US 31 running straight north. Good stuff for continued future economic growth.
  • Always Positive News
    All around good news. I-69 has cost more than we anticipated, been built to a substandard grade, has no funding source for the remaining portions and we won't charge poeple using it to use it. This certainly isn't a "boondoggle"

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT