IBJNews

First Internet Bancorp seeking to list on NASDAQ

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

First Internet Bancorp, parent of Indianapolis-based First Internet Bank of Indiana, is seeking to have its stock traded on the NASDAQ exchange.

The company announced Tuesday that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to make the move from the over-the-counter board.

Company shares, which opened Wednesday morning priced at $19.25 each, have been listed on the thinly traded OTC market under the FIBP ticker symbol since 2005.

Chairman and CEO David Becker said in a prepared statement that he expects the change to be completed sometime next year.

“The board of directors believes that our plan to move from the over-the-counter market to a national exchange will enhance the trading market for our stock and provide a long-term benefit to our shareholders,” he said.

Becker founded First Internet Bank in 1999. The bank has no branches and has 95 employees at its corporate headquarters at 9200 Keystone Crossing. First Internet said in its SEC filing that it expects to move early next year into 23,891 square feet of space, which is more than 9,000 square feet larger than its current office.

For the quarter ended Sept. 30, the company earned $1.6 million, or 85 cents per share, compared with $765,000, or 40 cents per share, during the same period last year.

Through the first nine months of 2012, the bank reported profit of $4 million, or $2.12 per share, compared with $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, in the year-ago period.

First Internet attributed the increase to gains on loans sold and growth in deposits.

Loans held for sale totaled $55.5 million as of Sept. 30, compared with $44.4 million at the same time in 2011.

Total deposits in the third quarter grew 13 percent, to $522.7 million.

Assets increased 12 percent, to a record $627.7 million.

On Nov. 20, the bank announced a cash dividend of 25 cents per share payable Dec. 28, the first dividend the bank has ever paid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A non-compete clause is expected to keep Buchman from appearing on-air at WTHR for a year from the WISH contract’s expiration.

  2. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  3. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  4. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  5. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

ADVERTISEMENT