IBJNews

Lilly discontinues late-stage trial in rheumatoid arthritis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. said it discontinued a trial of an experimental rheumatoid arthritis drug for lack of efficacy.

The trial, in the last stage of three generally required for regulatory approval, is one of three studies of tabalumab in rheumatoid arthritis, the Indianapolis-based company said Thursday in a prepared statement. The decision wasn’t based on safety concerns, Lilly said.

The company is still weighing the drug in the two other late-stage studies, and is holding off on enrolling new patients until more analyses are finished early next year. Those studies are being done in different populations of patients, Lilly said. The company is still evaluating tabalumab in systemic lupus erythematosus.

“The results of this study were unexpected given the data generated in earlier Phase II clinical studies of tabalumab,” Eiry Roberts, Lilly’s vice president of autoimmune product development, said in the statement. “We remain committed to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and will move rapidly to evaluate the impact of these data on the overall tabalumab clinical development program.”

Lilly said it expects to take a pretax charge of $20 million to $35 million in the fourth quarter, or about 2 cents a share after tax. The company’s 2012 forecast is unchanged, it said.

Two other companies reported discouraging trial results for a rheumatoid arthritis drug on Thursday. AstraZeneca PLC and Rigel Therapeutics Inc. said their drug fostamatinib did not work as well as Abbott Laboratories Inc.'s Humira in a mid-stage clinical trial. AstraZeneca is running a larger trial of fostamatinib and expects to get results in early 2013.

Rigel's stock plunged 34.6 percent, to $5.51 per share, Thursday on the news.

Humira is the leading rheumatoid arthritis drug by sales, bringing in about $9 billion in annual revenue.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a major area of research for drug companies because it is a chronic condition, meaning patients will likely take the drugs regularly for a long time. In November, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new treatment for the disease, Pfizer Inc.'s twice-a-day pill Xeljanz.

Shares of Lilly lost 77 cents, to $48.23 each, on Thursday. AstraZeneca shares fell 2.9 percent, to $47.46, and shares of Abbott Laboratories lost 69 cents, to $65.32.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT