IBJNews

BrightPoint executive Howell stepping down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A longtime high-ranking executive for BrightPoint Inc. in Indianapolis will resign effective Jan. 18, three months after California-based Ingram Micro Inc. acquired the company.

J. Mark Howell, who became president of the company's North American region after BrightPoint merged into Santa Ana-based Ingram in October, resigned to “pursue personal interests,” Ingram said in a prepared statement.

He leaves after 18 years in upper management at BrightPoint, which provides logistics and distribution services to the mobile technology industry.

A golden parachute clause in Ingram’s $840 million acquisition agreement provided Howell with approximately $6.7 million as he and five other executives split $30.7 million in payouts.

Bashar Nejdawi will step into Howell’s position, the company said.

Nejdawi has most recently been the senior vice president of corporate strategic initiatives and partnerships for BrightPoint and Ingram Micro Mobility. He began working for the company in 2008 as president of the mobile enhancement business.

Howell’s departure comes as Ingram determines how BrightPoint, with its focus on logistics services for handheld mobile device companies, will fit into the operations of its new, much larger parent, which focuses on broader IT services.

Before the merger, BrightPoint had 4,000 employees worldwide, with 1,100 people in central Indiana.

Ingram has remained silent on possible layoffs. But cost-cutting will likely happen in some capacity as the IT service provider eyes $55 million in "cost synergies."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • $$$
    Another Brightpoint exec leaves with millions in his pocket. Who's next?
  • Best of Luck
    Congrats, Mr. Howell, on a great ride. Your value to our community cannot be understated. You are a great leader and servant. Best wishes for your next endeavor.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

    ADVERTISEMENT