IBJNews

Lawmakers eye workforce development in new session

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's General Assembly got off to a quick start Monday with Republican leaders promising to focus on workforce development and Democrats seeking a two-year moratorium on divisive social issues.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said training people for new, advanced manufacturing jobs will take precedence the next four months.

New House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, emphasized that among Democrats' priorities is a request to avoid divisive social issues like gay marriage and abortion for the next two years. But Bosma rebuffed the call for a moratorium, saying the term "social issue" is highly subjective.

"We aren't declaring a moratorium on anything. That hasn't been my normal custom to make those types of decisions on behalf of the body," Bosma said.

Still, Pelath asked Republicans to show "enlightened restraint" on their "goals" for such issues in the coming months.

"Above all, we must make sure the power of government does not shift far from the center; the majority has a duty not to misinterpret the reasons why they were elected," said Pelath, leader of the heavily outnumbered Democrats.

The 2013 session will be filled with talks of what should be in the state's next biennial budget, from a potential personal income tax cut to the restoration of education spending cut in the last few years. How social issues will be handled, including an effort to write the state's ban on gay marriage into the state constitution, remains a looming question.

The marriage debate, in particular, has the ability to suck the air out of the 2013 session. Bosma declined Monday to push off the gay marriage battle until later, but Long has said he's waiting on a legal review of what impact a Supreme Court ruling would have before deciding whether to take up the issue.

Meanwhile, the Assembly's other 148 lawmakers plan to begin meeting in committees this week to vet a wide range of proposals. The Senate education committee will consider an expansion of the school voucher program and proposals to increase funding and flexibility for high-performing schools.

Lawmakers also await Gov.-elect Mike Pence's first legislative agenda. He laid out the broad strokes on the campaign trail, but has yet to fill in the details. Pence takes office Jan. 14.

One of the few definitive proposals from Pence — an effort to cut the personal income tax from 3.4 percent to 3.06 percent — has gotten a chilly reception from lawmakers in both chambers.

Long said he expected plenty of discussion about the 10 percent income tax cut, although a decision on that might not be made until near the end of the legislative session in April and legislators have reviewed the latest state revenue projections.

"We'll have to see how the economy is doing," Long said. "Have we had a hiccup or not? Are we doing better than we thought? Those are obviously the key factors in deciding how to address that particular issue."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Workforce Development?
    Really? Between RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, new terrain I-69, and the bang up effort of our state economic development team bringing commitments for tens of thousands of job, I would have thought we'd be advertising out of state by now for workers to come to the land of milk and honey.
  • Go to Illinois
    On a side note, the Democrats are free to go to Illinois during this session. We won't have to beg you to do your job this year. You're really not needed.
  • re: Fletchmon
    It's amazing how little this is discussed in the local media. It seems only business owners are aware of this penalty since we seem to be the only people paying the bill.
  • Well Said Fletch
    Yes - Indiana employers are paying the interest to the Feds because the Department of Workforce Development can't afford the interest. They call it un-employment "insurance" but we should call it what it really is - a tax. It should be deducted from the employess checks instead of the employers. Under the current plan, if Fletch has nothing to do, and I allow him to sweep my floors for money, when he's done sweeping I now owe him more money if I have nothing left for him to do. The current systems reminds me to sweep my own floors, lest I be taxed in case I no longer have floors to sweep.
  • IN Pays Tax Penalty to Feds
    Brian Bosma is well aware that under Mitch Daniels, the state has failed to pay back $2 BILLION in loans to the Federal govt for borrowing to meet unemployment payments. All IN employers are now paying a monthly tax surcharge due to the default on state payments. We have never had a staff layoff or reduction in our business yet we pay this monthly. The lack of financial responsibility by the Daniels admin means our state pays the 2nd highest unemployment surchage in the entire nation. http://idsnews.com/news/story.aspx?id=80199

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT