Speedway agrees to major overhaul in ADA settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Motor Speedway has reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to bring the historic structure into compliance with federal disability guidelines after investigators found 360 violations of federal disability law.

The settlement, announced Thursday afternoon, stems from a 1999 complaint from Dan Ward, who claimed that his wheelchair prevented him access to the pit area during an Indianapolis 500 practice session even though he had a pit pass.

As a result, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has worked with IMS officials to come up with a plan to bring the facility into compliance by modifying or improving hundreds of features, elements and spaces, including restrooms, parking lots, grandstands and dining areas.

A Department of Justice spokesperson said the modifications, which are estimated to take 30 months to complete, likely will cost the speedway “millions of dollars.”

IMS will pay Ward $35,000 to settle the complaint and will submit a report to the U.S. Attorney’s Office every 90 days for the next two years, updating the office on the progress of the changes to the speedway.

The speedway also agreed to permit follow-up inspections from Department of Justice officials and to design future buildings to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In addition, IMS has agreed to develop new training procedures for employees and to develop a policy that permits individuals with disabilities to enter the pit or garage areas with the proper credentials.

The speedway was built in 1909, well before the ADA took effect in 1990.

“For more than a century, the Indianapolis Motor Speedway has been a treasured symbol for all Hoosiers, and this agreement ensures that it will now be accessible to all Hoosiers,” U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Hogsett said in a prepared statement.


  • The delay is embarrassment to Indiana
    I am embarrassed as a Hoosier that the Speedway has taken nearly 14 years to settle this complaint and to come up with a corrective plan.
  • Shameful
    It is shameful that it took a law suit and a multi-year Federal investigation for IMS to do the right, legal and respectable thing.
    • Bristol is in compliance!
      We attended the Bristol Motor Speedway in August 2011. They have excellent supportive measures in place for those of us in wheelchairs. The wheelchair spot seating allows adequate room for large electric wheelchairs like mine. They have individual handicap bathrooms inside the racetrack bleachers area. My husband had a nice "attendants" seat right next to my wheelchair seat and the racetrack seating attendants were very helpful and checked on us regularly to ensure we had a great raceday experience. We camped for the week prior to the race weekend at the racetrack's "Thunder Road" casmpground and their campground has nice bathing and toilet facilities. That week, the racetrack even supplied vans for those of us that are handicapped and my husband was allowed to ride with me everytime they took me back and forth to the racetrack or downtown for the driver's parade. Finally, I would like to add that some of the drivers and their booths down in the outside area setup for raceteam advertising are equipped so that I could participate in those events as well and the day that I went to where Michael Waltrip was speaking and signing autographs, I was one of the first people to arrive in front of the stage. I really wanted a "Lucky Dog" and Michael's autograph, but when Michael stepped out onto the stage, a rude man stepped in front of me so that I could not be seen {I thought). Michael being the kind gentleman that he is did see me and handed the man a Lucky Dog and had him hand it to me and did not give that man any of the things they were handing out. Then one of the Sharpie girls in the booth next to the stage saw that I was holding my Lucky Dog up for an autograph but Michael did not see me. She asked to hold my Lucky Dog and took it backstage and Michael's young lady that was helping him took it out onto the stage and he signed it and sent it back to me. What great memories! Boy, I couldn't have had a more pleasurable racing experience. I am glad to hear that the Indianapolis Speedway is modernizing their facilities so that others can experience the great Nascar Raceday experience.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.