IPS chief White goes public with plan to retire in April

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The embattled superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools says he's retiring from the state's largest school system on April 5.

Eugene White, 65, announced the move to the IPS board Tuesday night.

IBJ reported earlier Tuesday that White was planning to leave the job.

The board will pay White about $800,000 for the remainder of his contract, which runs through 2015, Fox59 reported.

The state took over control of three IPS high schools and one middle school this year and turned them over to private operators after years of poor student performance.

White's standing with the IPS board took a hit with the recent retirement of two longtime backers and the November election defeat of a third. The new board members took office last week.

White was a principal at Fort Wayne Wayne and Indianapolis North Central high schools before becoming superintendent of the Washington Township schools in 1994. He moved to IPS in 2005.

“Eugene White’s tenure as IPS Superintendent was a time of many challenges and successes," Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard said in  prepared statement. "I appreciate his service to our community and look forward to a continued strong relationship with IPS as we work to advance the educational needs of our children in Indianapolis.”


  • Next
    The issues with IPS are far more reaching than the efforts of one person. Face it.. White is one man in the moment and I believe attempted to do the best he could, however, he did not have enough "men" in the mix to help pull on the rope. IPS issues are many... 40 years if flight to the burbs, federal mandates, family breakdown and politics! No one person is gonna save the system, but if more men would say I'll be a part of the solution at home and in the community it would be a great start! White should not hang his head. He inherited a runaway train and my hope is that the new board doesn't see that one man or woman can fix it! It's gonna take alot of men and women in this community at the table. For our kids and cities future, we cannot afford any less than an all out effort for IPS! If not, draw the shade and divvy it up to the townships.
  • Time for change and hope
    The IPS system is overburdened with students who have multiple challenges... speak english as their secondary language, children who have parents unwilling or unable to prepare their chidren for elementary school(teach the most basic reading and writing skills). We need a Leader who has significant and successful experiences turning around low performing equivilant sized school district with similar socio and economic challenges. IPS has the oppotunity to hire a Leader who can create a culture of commitment and engagement for administrators, teachers, parents and students! The real question is whether the school board has the vision, ability and commitment to attract a high performing leader willing to take on this huge challenge. The board needs to hire a national executive search firm who specializes recruiting the best leaders in education.
  • Forced
    He is obviously being forced out. He will retire until some school district offers him another contract. I just hope his IPS contract ends if and when he gets another job. This is a very tough job. I hope they can find the right person to move the district forward.
  • Why is he being Paidout??
    If he is choosing to retire, why is he being paid though his contract to the tune of $800000.00. They have laid teachers off, eliminated programs and say there is just not enough money to to properly run the system but there is enough money to pay for two superintendents though 2015. He needs to retire and get some new blood who can turn IPS into a decent school system. More ridiculousness by management or the lack of.............

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.