IBJNews

Michigan lawyer claims Indiana prosecution was political

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Michigan attorney claims in a lawsuit that former Indianapolis prosecutor Carl Brizzi and former Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita used unwarranted charges against her in a cemetery theft scheme to enhance their political reputations.

Sherry Katz-Crank, of East Lansing, Mich., was indicted in 2008 on theft charges related to a scheme to raid $24 million in trust funds set aside for prepaid funerals and burials. A jury acquitted her in 2010.

The lawsuit filed last month in federal court in Michigan contends the charges were linked to legal work Katz-Crank did for cemetery owner Robert Nelms of Greenwood, who was sentenced in January 2010 to serve eight years in community corrections after pleading guilty to theft and securities fraud. The charges alleged Katz-Crank had aided Nelms in the scheme by providing him with legal advice, the lawsuit said.

The suit accuses Brizzi, Rokita and several investigators and assistant prosecutors with their former offices of malicious prosecution and violating Katz-Crank's constitutional rights.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority credited Katz-Crank with reporting the scheme to authorities, whose investigations eventually led to the arrests of Nelms and others, the lawsuit claims. But when Katz-Crank discovered the scheme and reported it to the Indiana secretary of state's office, an investigator there contacted her clients and advised them to stop using her services because she was involved in illegal activity, the document says.

The court issued summonses last week for several defendants, including Rokita, who is now a U.S. representative. The secretary of state's website still includes a statement from 2008 in which Rokita touts his office's work in the investigation that led to the indictments. Brizzi was Marion County prosecutor at the time.

Brizzi didn't respond to a phone call from The Associated Press seeking comment Friday. Rokita's congressional spokesman, Josh Bratton, said the office had not yet seen the complaint.

The lawsuit contends that prosecuting attorneys never turned over evidence to the jury that might have cleared Katz-Crank and that the prosecutors had reason to believe some witnesses' testimony was false.

"It is clear that Plaintiff's indictment was used as marketing material to support the political campaigns of Defendants for higher office without regard for the serious and permanent damage which it would impose upon the Plaintiff and her family," the lawsuit asserts.

The complaint claims that the "political hubris" by Rokita and Brizzi directly caused Katz-Crank to lose her reputation and law firm and cost her more than $2 million in financial losses. It also says the ordeal caused her to suffer depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical ailments that resulted in surgery and hospitalization.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT