IBJNews

Former newspaper executive Russell dies at 92

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The former president and chairman of Central Newspapers Inc., which published the Arizona Republic and the Indianapolis Star before being sold to Gannett Co. Inc., in 2000, has died. He was 92.

Frank E. Russell died early Saturday in Phoenix.

Russell served as president of Central Newspapers Inc. from 1979 to 1998. The company also published the Arizona Business Gazette and other publications before Gannett purchased it.

The newspaper said Russell divided time between homes in Indianapolis and Phoenix.

John Zidich, CEO and publisher of the Republic, praised Russell's business acumen and passion for the community, adding that Russell earned a stellar reputation in the media industry and "has left an indelible mark with impact throughout Arizona."

The Republic said Russell was recognized by the Arizona State University Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication for his years of leadership in Phoenix when it created the Frank E. Russell Chair in Business and Journalism. That kind of honor "speaks volumes about his many contributions to the industry and community," Zidich said.

Louis A. 'Chip' Weil III, who Russell recruited in 1991 to become publisher and CEO of Phoenix Newspapers Inc., said in a statement that Russell "was a man of the highest integrity. He was, above all, a great listener. And, after digesting all information, would act, invariably doing the right thing. His people skills were beyond reproach, giving many, including me, the chance to succeed. As CEO of Central Newspapers, he led the company to new heights."

Weil was named president and CEO of Central Newspapers in 1996 upon Russell's retirement.

Russell began his newspaper career in 1959 as a business manager for Eugene Pulliam, founder of the Indianapolis Star and Central Newspapers, who found his background as a lawyer and certified public accountant an invaluable asset.

Pulliam's wife, Nina, turned to Russell to help carry on her humanitarian interests that would create opportunities for people in need, care for animals and nature, and improve community life in Arizona and Indiana where she lived and worked.

After she died in 1997, the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust began. Russell became the chair and his wife, Nancy, a founding trustee. Until they stepped down from the trust in December 2011, the Russells awarded more than $192 million to 847 Arizona and Indiana non-profit agencies.

"Doing things for grateful people that have benefited one way or another from the trust has been a pleasure and a reward," Frank Russell said at the time, in an interview with The Republic.

The trust developed "Nina Scholars," which has become a nationally recognized program that provides scholarship opportunities for three underserved populations: adults with dependents in the household; college-age youth raised in the child-welfare system; and students with physical challenges.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Too bad he sold the Newspaper
    Gannett papers are so bad, I seldom ready the Indystar.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT