Zimmer highly exposed to health-reform risk

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Zimmer Holdings Inc. have generated impressive returns of 23 percent in the past year and some 2013 product launches could juice those results even further. But the Warsaw-based maker of orthopedic implants is also the most-exposed company in its industry to two key elements of health care reform: the medical device tax and bundled payments.

Zimmer, which is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter earnings Thursday, derives about 50 percent of its $4.5 billion in annual sales from the United States—a much higher proportion than any of its competitors.

Starting in the second half of this year, a new 2.3-percent tax on medical devices—created by the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act—will start taking about a $50 million-per-year bite out of Zimmer’s revenue, according to estimates by multiple analysts.

“In our view, ZMH has lagged its competition in diversifying its business model, especially in expanding its emerging market exposure,” Stifel Nicolaus analyst Rick Wise wrote in a Nov. 19 report on Zimmer, noting that the company derives as much as 85 percent of its sales from the developed markets of the United States, Europe, Japan and Australia.

Also, Zimmer’s heavy reliance on U.S. sales means it has the most to lose from bundled-payment initiatives, which are being eagerly embraced by hospitals, according to an in-depth report on the topic issued by J.P. Morgan analysts in October.

That report, based on a survey of 46 U.S. hospital administrators, found that three-quarters of them plan to launch a bundled-payment initiative this year. And 52 percent of them already have submitted plans to Medicare to target orthopedics—a higher percentage than any category except general surgery, which 54 percent of hospitals plan to target.

Interventional cardiology (35 percent) and cardiac surgery (28 percent) were among the other big categories targeted for bundled-payment initiatives, according to J.P. Morgan’s survey.

Bundled payments will be launched this year by the federal Medicare program. Medicare will offer to pay hospitals one fee for a hospital stay or a hospital stay and recovery care. The payment would include fees for both hospital and doctors' services, discounted from the current Medicare fee schedules.

Any savings the hospitals and doctors could achieve below that discount would be theirs to keep, and divvy up according to their internal contracts.

The survey suggests that hip and knee replacement surgeries—Zimmer’s bread and butter—are at the top of the list for hospitals trying to save money under bundled-payment arrangements. They will be seeking to wring better pricing deals from orthopedic implant makers by choosing to source all their implants from as few manufacturers as possible. Also, they will be working to help patients avoid the need for joint replacements in the first place.

“Those most impacted are likely to be device and implant manufacturers as hospitals try to achieve both lower pricing on implants and lower utilization of supplies and devices,” wrote J.P. Morgan analyst Michael Weinstein.

Weinstein estimates that Zimmer derives 35 percent of its total sales from U.S. hip and knee implants—nearly twice as large a percentage as its nearest competitor, Michigan-based Stryker Corp.

“Under a Bundled Payments world, it is this mix piece [i.e., product volumes] that we see coming under more direct pressure,” Weinstein added. “In our large cap coverage, this would render Zimmer most exposed.”



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1