IBJNews

Mayor to take control of four struggling Indy schools

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana State Board of Education is handing authority over four troubled Indianapolis schools to the city's mayor.

The board's unanimous vote Wednesday will give Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard control over Arlington, Howe and Manual high schools and Donnan Middle School at the end of the current school year. The mayor's office will have oversight over 33 total schools, including 22 charter schools now open and seven more opening in the next two years.

"We now can move forward with working to improve these schools and collaborating with community stakeholders to offer high-quality education for students," Ballard said in a statement.

The four schools Ballard is taking over were previously part of Indianapolis Public Schools. The state took control of them last summer following six straight years of failing performance.

Florida-based Charter Schools USA was hired by the State Board of Education to manage Howe, Manual and Donnan. Indianapolis-based EdPower, a school management arm of the Charles A. Tindley charter school, was hired to manage Arlington.

"I'm a firm believer that local oversight at the local level is always in the best interest of the schools," said Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz. "We are very comfortable with the local focus."

In 2011, the state's assistant superintendent said the schools were "in various stages of dire situations." The Board of Education later decided to hand the schools over to the state because of poor classroom performance. Department of Education staff visiting Arlington High School found classrooms with no discipline, students resting their heads on desks and no academic questioning of students by teachers.

Ritz emphasized that the state Board of Education still has ultimate authority over the schools. The state has contracts with the four takeover schools that last through the next four years, and the board will be discussing an exit strategy for when the contracts end, Ritz said.

The school takeovers were a first in Indiana history. Private companies are currently managing the four schools the mayor has been given authority over.

The state Department of Education and the city of Indianapolis will work out a memorandum of understanding to detail the transfer of the schools to the city, said David Galvin, a spokesman for the department.

"(The mayor) has the same authority as the state Department of Education would have had," Galvin said. "He has purview over the contracts and the performance of the schools and he presides over the schools.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I didn't know
    ...worked on this message board. Damn.
  • KEEPIN IT REAL!
    Is this Mayor really this STUPID? He cannot provide basic city services, has not and cannot hire and provide the proper # of police officers and keep the county safe the roads and sidewalks are in the worst shape they have ever been in and now he wants to blow payroll $$, admin fees and energy on schools the state took over. I live in the Marion County Suburbs and WHY Mr. Big Shot Mayor should any of my COIT and Prop Taxes be used for this farce? Are your political grafters going to get contracts for parking garages and construction and procurement contracts at these schools? You cannot even perform basic Mayoral Executive functions. HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT OF LESS BLOAT LESS GOVERNMENT AND A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO MARION COUNTY TAXPAYERS?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT