IBJNews

ExactTarget loss grows, but revenue hits record

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Marketing software company ExactTarget Inc. took a greater loss in the fourth quarter due to higher expenses.

The Indianapolis-based company announced Thursday that it lost $13 million in the quarter ended Dec. 31 compared with a $6.1 million loss for the same period of 2011.

On a per-share basis, however, the loss dropped to 19 cents from 68 cents a year earlier because of a huge increase in common shares that hit the market after the company went public in March 2012.

Operating expenses, which include marketing, research and development, rose 48 percent in the quarter, to $65.8 million.

Revenue increased 42 percent to a record $84.2 million. For the year, revenue grew 41 percent, to $292.3 million.

"Our fourth quarter results were outstanding, putting an explanation point on a historic year for ExactTarget and further extending our market leadership," CEO Scott Dorsey said in a conference call.
  
ExactTarget late last year acquired B2B software provider Pardot and Indianapolis-based Web personalization provider iGoDigital.

For the year, ExactTarget lost $21 million, or 39 cents a share, compared with a 2011 loss of $35.4 million, or $4.05 per share.

During the fourth quarter, the company added offices in Paris and Stockholm.

The company now employs 1,673 people—most of them in Indianapolis—compared with 1,133 at the beginning of 2012.

ExactTarget shares rose 80 cents, or 3.5 percent, Friday morning, to $23.59 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ja!
    Offices in Paris and Stockholm? Before this article, I only suspected this was a sham company. Now I am certain of it.
  • Spam Tastes Bad
    Spam marketing stinks, but I guess there's a place for it in the world. In the year 2011, the estimated figure for spam messages is around seven trillion. PUKE

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT