IBJNews

  • Home

UPDATE: First Internet slips 2.5 percent in debut on NASDAQ

IBJ Staff
February 22, 2013
Keywords
Banking & Finance, Banks, First Internet Bank, Indiana Banks, Investing, Online Banking, Stock Market
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Shares of Indianapolis-based First Internet Bancorp slipped in their first day on the NASDAQ exchange, dropping 2.5 percent during trading on Friday.

Shares finished the day at $28.50, a 75-cent decline from their opening price of $29.25.

The parent of First Internet Bank announced in December that it had filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to make the move to NASDAQ from the over-the-counter board. Its new ticker symbol is INBK.

The shares had been listed on the thinly traded over-the-counter market under the FIBP ticker since 2005. Shares closed Thursday at $27.74 each.

Chairman and CEO David Becker founded First Internet Bank in 1999. The bank has no branches and has 102 employees at its headquarters at 9200 Keystone Crossing.

"We are pleased to be joining NASDAQ, as it includes more regional and community banks than any other U.S. exchange,” Becker said in a prepared statement. ”The board of directors believes that our plan to move from the over-the-counter market to NASDAQ will improve the visibility of our stock and enhance trading liquidity in our shares, which provides a long-term benefit to our shareholders."

On Tuesday, First Internet announced plans to add 48 jobs as part of a $4.3 million expansion into Fishers.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT