IBJNews

Lawmakers see atmosphere shift inside Indiana Statehouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republican and Democratic legislators stood and applauded in the Indiana House chamber a couple weeks ago after voting unanimously to support a bill that would create a state council to match up available training programs and job opportunities.

While not a contentious topic, the sight on the House floor was a stark contrast to the past couple years, when bitter fights over Republican efforts for the right-to-work law and private school vouchers led thousands of union protesters to fill the Statehouse halls and sparked a five-week boycott by most House Democrats.

The first half of this year's General Assembly session has been much quieter, at least partly because of election victories in November that gave Republicans a larger House majority, preventing new Democratic walkouts from stopping legislative action.

Leaders of the more-powerful Republican supermajorities in the House and Senate haven't walked in lockstep with new GOP Gov. Mike Pence over tax-and-spending issues and have so far only worked around the edges of some potentially divisive issues that their most conservative backers support.

Pence has largely kept a low profile in the Statehouse during his first seven weeks in office, although he has had private meetings with at least three-quarters of the 150 state senators and representatives. Pence was tepid last week with his praise of the General Assembly, saying he "reasonably satisfied" with progress on his priorities so far this session.

But he sounds more critical when it comes to talking about the House budget plan that didn't include his top campaign issue: a 10-percent cut in the state's personal income tax rate.

"I am still disappointed that the House passed a budget that has significant increases in spending and not one cent of new tax relief for individuals, for working families and for most small businesses," Pence said.

House Democrats tried to force Republicans into a vote on the governor's tax cut plan in one of the relatively few edgy floor confrontations during the legislative session's first two months, but GOP House Speaker Brian Bosma declared the move violated a procedural rule. That cleared the way for the House to later send the budget on to the Senate for more debate leading up to the session's deadline in late April.

Bosma and new House Democratic Leader Scott Pelath of Michigan City — who this session replaced longtime Bosma foil and 2011 boycott leader Rep. Pat Bauer — have often praised each other for working to improve the legislative atmosphere.

Pelath says a more civil tone was needed after "a rough past few years." Bosma says "we have a nice mix right now" of personalities.

Democratic lawmakers, however, still maintain Pence and legislative Republicans are squandering chances to quickly spur job growth. They point to GOP differences over Pence's tax proposals and unwillingness to act on implementing the federal health care overhaul.

"We don't have clear message coming from the Republican majorities and the governor," Pelath said. "We don't have a clear direction for Indiana."

Republican leaders bottled up tea party-backed measures challenging the health care overhaul and other federal laws, and a bill that sought to allow the Lord's Prayer to be recited in schools. They also decided to delay until next year a vote on a proposed state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, while taking up a proposal to require women seeking the abortion pill to first undergo an ultrasound.

Pelath argues that such issues take the Legislature's focus away from trying to boost the state's economy.

"I don't know what's been accomplished other than stoking the Republican base," he said.

Bosma says he considers this year's legislative session positive and productive so far.

It has certainly been quieter. This year's biggest Statehouse protest came when a few hundred people gathered to call for the state to withdraw from a set of national reading and math school standards.

With some Republican legislators even referring during debates to "Speaker Bauer" — a reference to the South Bend Democrat's years preceding Bosma as the one controlling the House gavel — it has certainly been more civil.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Thankfully no mandate for a platform.
    So Rick, are you trying to say that the rural, agriculturally dominated parts of the state, where the GOP overwhelmingly dominates and where the supply of corn far outstrips the demand, do NOT receive subsidies? Are you trying to suggest that those same rural areas are witnessing colossal job growth, thanks to their high concentration of skilled workers? Are you trying to suggest that any growth in the rural counties happens purely through the free market and not because of tax abatements or other incentives? I'm grateful we have at least the semblance of an opposition party (however scrappy it may be) that will help keep the aggressive "conservative platform"--one that has never once helped stem Indiana's relentless brain drain--from turning this state into a cold-weather Dixieland.
  • Get Busy!
    Can we dispense with the absurdity of legislating morality and get busy? Every year, Bosma has to keep a lid on the kooks. Where do these people come from? Abortion ? Like it or not, it's legal. Gay marriage? Like it or not, it's not legally recognized in Indiana (i.e. been there done that and don't need the amendment). Unions? Killed the manufacturing sector 30 years ago, so not a lot of sympathy there. So why do we have to keep hearing about these same old tropes? You people in the legislature need to get things done and quit paying attention to the noisy but irrelevant fringes on both sides.
  • Learned from the best
    Pelath is cut from the same rug (pun intended) of his predecessor with his constant stream of backhanded compliments and insipid editorials such as: "We don't have clear message coming from the Republican majorities and the governor," Pelath said. "We don't have a clear direction for Indiana." Sorry Scott but Indiana DOES have a clear direction. That direction is a conservative platform. The only reason the dems have any seats is because of the metro areas where most of your voting base is union and/or subsidized. Common sense, decency, and morals finally found a state from which to battle the pro-subsidy, pro-homosexual, anti-family, anti-job party.
  • correction to ultrasound
    "...while taking up a proposal to require women seeking the abortion pill to first undergo an ultrasound." To clarify for those that are unaware of what KIND of ultrasound will be required. Via Harvard Health Publication: "For a transvaginal ultrasound, the doctor or technician covers a sensor with a condom and some jelly before inserting it into the vagina." So in short, a woman is penetrated by a radar wand covered in lube and a condom. How very family oriented!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT