IBJNews

Indy hospitals healthy despite sequester

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As President Obama said, the pain of the federal sequester will be real. But when it comes to hospitals, how real and how painful depends on where they are and how big they are.

While rural hospitals face sharp reductions in their operating margins, most of the four major hospital systems based in Indianapolis will see only a marginal impact on their profits.

The 35 critical-access hospitals in Indiana—which have just 25 beds each and tend to be in rural areas—will see their operating margins chopped by 31 percent, according to data provided by the Indiana Rural Health Association.

Such hospitals now generate operating margins of just 1.58 percent, and a 12-month sequester would drop those margins to 1.09 percent. Operating margins reflect the profitability of a hospital’s health care services, and excludes any gains or losses recorded on investments.

“It’s a perfect storm, in my opinion,” said Don Kelso, executive director of the Indiana Rural Health Association. “Rising costs to provide care to the people that need the care at the same time your reimbursements are being cut."

But the story will be far different for the four large hospital systems based in Indianapolis.

If the 2-percent Medicare reimbursement cuts from the sequester had been effective in 2011—the most recent year for which local hospitals have reported financial results—their operating margins would have been reduced by 8 percent to 16 percent. Even those cuts would have left each hospital system with healthy margins of no less than 3.8 percent.

Indiana University Health would have seen its operating income of $186 million fall nearly $21 million, or about 11 percent. IU Health’s operating margin would have declined from 4.3 percent to 3.8 percent.

St. Vincent Health would have seen its operating income of $157.7 million fall about $12 million, or 7.6 percent. That cut would have reduced its margin from 7.2 percent to 6.7 percent.

Community Health Network would have seen its operating income of $75.7 million reduced about $7 million, or about 9 percent. That would have meant its operating margin would have been reduced from 5.6 percent to 5 percent.

Franciscan Alliance would have seen its operating income of $114.8 million fall $18.5 million, or about 16 percent. Its operating margin would have fallen from 5.2 percent to 4.4 percent.

According to a large physician practice based in Indianapolis, American Health Network, the impact of the cuts will be minimal in the short term for large health care providers. But the pain will be felt long term.

“We are always concerned about reductions in physician payments,” Don Stumpp, past president of the Indiana Medical Group Management Association, wrote in an e-mail.  “While a 2-percent cut will not be devastating, physician practice costs continue to increase like any business. There won't be any immediate impact, but if the cut isn't reversed, doctors will need to make some budgetary adjustments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Healthcare is Big Business
    Each of the large hospitals in the Indianapolis Area have recruited and paid top tier surgeons a significant salary, which in turn has brought business to these hospitals, not just from rural hospitals that are affiliated with these large hospitals, but also from hospitals in cities as far away as Cincinnati.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT