IBJNews

Rally backs Indiana charter school, voucher programs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Supporters of Indiana's charter schools and private school vouchers packed a Statehouse corridor with hundreds of children from those schools for a rally Monday as they backed expansion of those programs.

Republican Gov. Mike Pence and the GOP House and Senate leaders all told the crowd of perhaps a couple thousand children and adults that the charter school and voucher programs had helped spur greater competition for improvement in the state's education system.

The "Ed Reform Rocks" rally happened as the Legislature is considering a proposal to expand Indiana's 2-year-old voucher system that already is the nation's largest. A bill already approved by the Indiana House this year would allow kindergartners and some other children to be eligible without first spending a year in public schools.

Pence called the rally a "celebration" of Indiana's "school choice" initiatives that now have some 30,000 students in charter schools and about 9,000 students receiving vouchers.

"If we give parents more choices and teachers more freedom to teach, education in Indiana will continue to rock," Pence told the crowd.

The voucher bill now pending in the state Senate makes several exemptions from the requirement included in the 2011 law that all students spend at least one year in public schools before becoming eligible for a voucher. It eliminates that requirement for siblings of current voucher students, for children in military and foster families and for children with special needs.

Susan Andrews, who attended the rally with her daughter's 3rd grade class from St. Mary's Catholic school in Rushville, said while her family isn't in the voucher program she believed it helped give parents more options in the rural county about 40 miles east of Indianapolis.

"I just think it's wonderful that we have that choice in our county," Andrews said.

Democratic legislators have questioned expanding the voucher eligibility, saying the state is stretching itself thin to fund three school systems — traditional public schools, charter schools and private schools through the voucher program.

Rep. Terry Goodin, D-Austin, said last year's election of Democrat Glenda Ritz, a voucher opponent, as state school superintendent was a sign that Republicans were pushing too soon for a bigger voucher program.

"They were passed under the guise of pilot projects, so let's see if they're working," said Goodin, superintendent of the Crothersville school district. "One year doesn't get that done."

Former Indiana Pacers star Jalen Rose told the rally crowd about the charter school he helped open in his hometown of Detroit to give troubled high school students another chance. Rose said Indiana has been on the forefront of change in education and that he wanted to steal some of its ideas.

"I'm now going to take this back to the state of Michigan and stand on the table to get vouchers for our students," Rose said.

Paris Witherspoon of Portage attended the rally with students from Charter School of the Dunes in Gary, which two of her children now attend.

Witherspoon said she believed the additional school options were helping children in the Gary area where many of the public schools have for years been troubled by low test scores and graduation rates.

"Why are we turning out a generation of kids that we're just letting go through?" she said. "It doesn't prepare them for the real world."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Involvement Or was it Make No Law Establishing
    Hmmmm. For some reason I was thinking that the Danbury Letter was suggesting that "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". The way I read that is that we make NO LAW. Does that mean we make no law? Or does that mean something else. I was thinking that it meant "Make no Law".
  • Vouchers vs. Charters
    You are confusing the voucher bill and charter school expansion. Vouchers are not for charter school use. Charter schools function as public school and are free. Vouchers are for use at private schools, the majority having religious affiliations. So when you say it's about choice and not religion, you might want to educate yourself on the lobbying done by churches backing the voucher bill. I'm sure it is because they were concerned about educating the poor, not taking money from the state...yeah, right!
  • How many Charters are Religiious?
    How many Charter Schools are religious? Give me a break, this is about choice not religion. no one is forcing students to private religious schools. the have been around for as long as you can remember. Now students who could not afford private school has a chance to get "educated" there. But if you want to go to a politically correct public school you still have that choice. Noone is forcing folks to go to private schools.
    • Voucher Rally
      It's too bad public school teachers and administrators can't give their kids the day off to come to the state house to lobby for public school issues. Sadly, vouchers are simply proving to be a back-door way to fund religious schools and thereby circumvent the constitutional ban on government support of religion. People forget that the phrase "separation of church and state" originated in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Church, a persecuted minority religion at the time, acknowledging their whole-hearted SUPPORT of a constitutional prohibition against governmental involvement in religious affairs. Oh the irony . . . .

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

      2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

      3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

      4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

      5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

      ADVERTISEMENT