IBJNews

IU president encouraged by state budget plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposed boost in the state's higher education funding is an encouraging step after more than $150 million was cut during the recession, Indiana University's president said Thursday.

IU President Michael McRobbie and other state university leaders testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee, which is reviewing the new two-year state spending plan. The version approved last month by the Republican-controlled House includes a 3.5-percent increase for the state's seven public universities — up from the 1-percent hike proposed by GOP Gov. Mike Pence.

The House proposal would add $42 million in operating money to the universities after more than $150 million in cuts ordered by then-Gov. Mitch Daniels since 2009.

"I'm very pleased that after four years of a very tight economy and very tight funding for higher education that the Legislature seems to be really very strongly supportive of reinvesting in higher education," McRobbie said after he testified.

McRobbie and other university officials outlined steps they've taken to limit student tuition increases and course-tracking programs aimed at making it more likely that students can graduate with degrees within four years.

State legislators have pushed university leaders on those issues, saying the schools needed to be more concerned about affordability and holding down student debt.

Appropriations committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said he was pleased with actions taken by Purdue, IU and other schools.

"I think we're all working on that together now, and I'm glad to see that," Kenley said.

Sen. Patricia Miller, R-Indianapolis, asked Purdue Provost Tim Sands to thank Daniels, now Purdue's president, for the two-year tuition freeze he announced this month for in-state students at the West Lafayette campus.

McRobbie, meanwhile, discussed the 25-percent discount on summer semester tuition that IU is now offering at each of the seven campuses it oversees around the state.

Committee member Sen. Tim Skinner, D-Terre Haute, said he was glad the budget proposal would reverse some of the funding cuts in higher education. But he was still concerned that larger schools, like IU, would receive more money than smaller schools, such as Ball State and Indiana State.

"I don't know that this budget is going to get them back to where they were a few years ago," Skinner said.

The House spending plan dedicates nearly $3.6 billion over the next two years — about 12 percent of the state budget — toward funding the universities and college financial aid programs.

Kenley called the House proposal "very generous" toward the universities.

"It appears to be justified by the fact that they've taken cuts previously and they've worked hard to develop efficiencies all over the universities," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT