IBJNews

Sherry Labs snapped up by Netherlands corporation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sherry Laboratories, a central Indiana materials-testing business with nearly 300 employees, has been acquired by Netherlands-based Element Materials Technology BV, the companies announced Monday.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Daleville-based Sherry, founded in 1947, was owned by Muncie-based Ontario Corp. from 1969 to 2006 before being sold to a private group led by several high-powered central Indiana businessmen, including Christopher LaMothe, CEO of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce from 1992 to 2002.

Joining him on the purchase were former Ball Corp. CEO John W. Fisher, who died in 2009, and Van Smith, the then-CEO of Ontario Corp.

LaMothe is still CEO and chairman of the company. Smith, who served as Indiana Gov. Mike Pence’s campaign chairman during the 2012 election, is an executive with the firm.

Sherry executives did not return a phone call seeking comment on the sale Monday morning.

Headquartered about 50 miles northeast of Indianapolis, Sherry conducts environmental, food, microbiological, and petrochemical testing services at 10 different facilities, including five in Indiana, three in Louisiana and one each in Ohio and Oklahoma.

The company has more than 6,000 clients in the aerospace, defense, energy and transportation industries.

Element, which operates more than 15 testing facilities throughout the United States, said the acquisition of Sherry makes it the nation’s largest dedicated materials-testing company.

Element officials did not return a phone call to discuss plans for Sherry.

Last August, Element said it had secured $93.2 million in new financing for an acquisition spree. It recently acquired lab businesses in Cincinnati and near Detroit.
 


 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT