IBJNews

State legislator defends supporting daughter's client

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A powerful Indiana House Republican on Monday defended his decision to support a Utah company his daughter represents as a Statehouse lobbyist, one week after Gov. Mike Pence placed a hold on state aid to a company run by the lawmaker's son.

House Speaker Pro Tem Eric Turner pushed a measure in the House opening the door for Insure-Rite to win a multimillion-dollar contract screening uninsured drivers for the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Turner's effort to include the proposal in a sweeping tax bill failed late last month, but a similar measure was signed into law by Pence last week.

Turner, R-Cicero, said he saw nothing wrong with advocating for the measure being sought by his daughter, Jessaca Turner Stults, a lobbyist working for Insure-Rite. He said he has previously voted against the interest of his daughter's clients on legislation and didn't think it was necessary to recuse himself.

"I vote the way I feel my constituents feel and the way I feel would be the best to vote," Turner said. "I only vote in what's in the best interest of Indiana."

Documents obtained by The Associated Press show Turner authored the failed House amendment. Turner and his daughter say it was instead written by House Ways and Means Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville. Brown said Turner asked for the amendment and he authorized it.

The news comes one week after Gov. Mike Pence placed a hold on state aid for Mainstreet Property Group, following an AP report about Turner's help in starting the company run by his son. Turner and a spokeswoman for Mainstreet have said the lawmaker had no involvement in winning the $345,000 in state aid for the company, but the Indiana Economic Development Corporation is reviewing the deal.

Stults said she saw nothing wrong with her father supporting the Insure-Rite measure and pointed to legislation he authored that would harm one of her other clients, online retailer Amazon.

"I think that we do a very good job of trying not to cross that line, but I'm not going to deny that I'm his daughter," Stults said. "This is my job, and I represent my clients. Just like he does what he needs to do from a policy perspective."

The House rules require that lawmakers recuse themselves from votes if "immediately and particularly interested in the result on any question." Turner said he did not need to recuse himself because he did not hold a direct financial stake.

Turner's situation is "a very clear conflict of interest," said Stuart Yoak, executive director of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics at Indiana University. If they don't, it can undermine public trust in the Legislature, he said.

Part-time lawmakers in the General Assembly often face conflicts of interest with either their other professions or their family's interests. But it's up to those lawmakers to decide whether they're doing something for personal benefit, instead of for the public's, and recuse themselves, Yoak said. If they don't, it can undermine public trust in the Legislature, he said.

"The fact that is the case doesn't mean that you are relieved of that moral obligation, to act on behalf of those citizens," he said. "You can't just use that as an excuse."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Kids
    How many more kids do you have Eric Turner? I suppose you will be helping them out soon too at the taxpayer's expense.
  • Legislator Conflicts of Interest
    I worked in the General Assembly 40 years ago. In fact, I was one of the first three "paid" legislative assistants the House of Rep. ever had. Back then, the legislators were mainly teachers, lawyers, or small business owners who made a real sacrifice to serve and they served the public well. Now, it seems like too many legislators are all about whatever it is they can get for themselves or their families. I think it is disgraceful.
  • Clueless
    Mr. Turner, I am a constiuent of yours and you are certainly not voting the way I would like for you to vote. Did we learn nothing from the last few week? You clearly have no regard for doing what is right. Recusing yourself should have been a no brainer. Do the right thing now and resign before you are voted out of office. Enough is enough.
  • COLLUSION
    I am so p...... Clark Griswold had it right about these people...Where's the Tylenol?
  • Merritt or Turner
    Im not sure who is more connected to making money off of their real jobs. Seems Turner and Merritt are doing very well on the backs of Hoosiers
  • Son was in IBJ 40 under 40
    Don't forget, the IBJ named Rep. Turner's son to its most recent version of the 40 Under 40 list.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT