IBJNews

Governor signs bill limiting specialty license plates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A plan overhauling Indiana's specialty auto license plate system and requiring all groups with plates to sell 500 a year has been signed into law by Gov. Mike Pence.

The bill approved by lawmakers creates an eight-member bipartisan commission to review requests from not-for-profit groups seeking specialty plates. The panel will check financial reports at least once a decade on how the groups are spending their plate proceeds.

The bill sets a limit of 150 specialty plates. A legislative report shows that 17 of the 92 specialty plates sold during the past two years fell short of selling the minimum 500 plates a year.

Supporters say the new rules are meant to keep a handle on the number of specialty plates and ensure the money is spent appropriately.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Help Governor!
    So where are the jobs? Maybe we can put everyone to work making license plates. Oops, Sorry! We use criminals for license plate production. Oh well, the legislature and the governor are too busy saving us from ourselves to worry about jobs. I guess we could Wander Indiana For Jobs!
  • One Plate
    Remember when you could easily identify what state a vehicle was from because each state had one design? If I were in law enforcement, I'd be advocating for one design per state. (Of course, I'd also lobby for requiring Indiana vehicles to have two license plates like most other states require.) If you want to support something, make a donation and buy a bumper sticker. I suppose I'm a little old-fashioned that way.
  • Nothing has changed
    The rules were always that 500 plates had to be sold each year. Apparently, the enforcement of that rule was lacking- As a not for profit, I gathered 800 signatures from citizens that would buy our proposed plate and we were denied by the government. They stated that the Police were concerned that there are already too many specialty plates in this state and that law enforcement no longer recognized all of the different ones therefore they didn't wish to grant any additional plates being placed into the marketplace. I guess the PD wasn't asked this time around OR the gov't doesn't care what they had to say.
  • Point on
    What an embarrassment that the indiana government is wasting it's time on items like this.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT