IBJNews

Report: Roche mulls sale of blood-glucose monitor business

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Roche Diagnostics Corp. is mulling a sale of its blood-glucose meter business, according to a Reuters report, a move that would cast uncertainty over the nearly 1,000 people working for its diabetes business in Indianapolis.

Reuters reported the potential sale on Wednesday, citing three people familiar with the matter. A Roche spokesman declined to comment to IBJ.

The entire blood-glucose meter industry is facing a huge hit to sales on July 1, when the federal Medicare program will start a competitive bidding program for blood-glucose testing strips and supplies, which could cut its payments as much as 72 percent. The Medicare program for seniors is the largest health insurance program in the United States.

The Medicare cuts will directly affect a Roche test-strip plant in Indianapolis, which employs more than 150 workers and churns out more than 2 billion strips per year.

Two years ago, Roche decided to spend $37 million to expand its test strip plant in Indianapolis, in part to keep up with growing global demand.

But, last year, reimbursement cuts, as well as stiff price competition from generic makers of blood-glucose meters, forced Roche to restructure its diabetes business. The company cut 100 diabetes care positions between its two main locations in Indianapolis and Mannheim, Germany.

“There are lots of players here that are discussing either pulling out, consolidating or just riding it through,” wrote Kelly Close and Kira Maker, two diabetes analysts at San Francisco-based market research firm Close Concerns Inc., in an April report.

Roche Diagnostics’ North American blood-glucose monitor sales declined 6 percent last year, to $598 million, according to Close Concerns. Close Concerns predicts Roche's blood-glucose sales in North America will swoon this year by 23 percent, to $463 million.

Roche's blood-glucose monitoring business has also been suffering globally. Sales declined 10 percent last year, to $2.5 billion, and Close Concerns predicts another 8-percent dropoff this year.

Roche isn't alone. In the United States, blood-glucose monitoring has been a declining business since sales peaked in 2007 at nearly $3 billion. But this year will be especially bad, with an estimated 19-percent decline in sales, according to Close Concerns. Globally, sales of blood-glucose monitors peaked in 2011, but then fell 5 percent last year and are expected to decline another 11 percent this year.

Reuters' sources said there are only a few possible buyers of Roche’s blood-glucose meter business, including Minnesota-based Medtronic Inc. and New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson.

A purchase by one of those companies could preserve Roche’s diabetes operations in Indianapolis, but it could also lead to their relocation.

However, a sale may not actually happen, Reuters noted. Last year, Germany-based Bayer AG attempted to sell its blood glucose meter business for about $1.5 billion, but failed to find a buyer.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • $wiss
    Does the buyer get to keep the recent Accu-Chek J.D. Power award? Be careful, those Swiss cannot be trusted. Last June they pimped Mayor Ballard and former Governor Daniels at a media op, announcing plans to invest "$300 million at its Indianapolis headquarters, creating up to 100 new jobs by 2017," only to turn around and close the Roche Nutley, NJ facility and eliminate 1000 jobs there later the same week. It seems that healthcare can be innovated only as long as money is to be made. Right now Roche seems to have big eyes for China: there are many Chinese in China and potential billions in Swiss francs! Since Roche is having difficulty with US insurance companies swallowing the bill for overpriced cancer drugs (with debatable efficacy) why not sell insurance to the Chinese and market the drugs to them there? There is a name for these sort of business practices however proper decorum precludes it use in this forum.
  • US regulations and wages can't match the generic price
    It would be nice if Roche could cut the price and still make money. But US manufacturing can't compete with China and India. We have FDA regulations, China has products mixed in outdoor, unsanitary, unregulated pots as we saw with the blood thinner that killed Americans a few years ago. I don't blame Roche. We have government rules and controls and taxes for what is US made. On price, we can't compete. Sad for companies that want to US produce. Dupree
  • Roche -Own worst enemy
    Roche and Bayer did it to themselves. Their products, especially their test strips, are so expensive that people who need to test 4 times a day or more can't afford them at almost $1 each. Anyone with diabetes should test before each meal and at bedtime. Those of us who are Type 1's test 7-10 times a day. It's no wonder everyone has moved towards Walmart and Kroger meters and test strips. Their test strips are less than half the cost of Roche's. Any diabetes educator could have told them this. Those corporate bigwigs saw only dollars in the epidemic of diabetes. Being unwilling to budge on price is going to cost them all in the end. It is a different world now.
  • Too expensive
    For years, the big players have given away free meters and then charged outrageous prices (because we can!) for the strips. You can go to Walmart and buy a meter for $16 and 100 test strips for less than $10. 100 "big name" strips might be $50! Pays for itself, the first time. #shortsighted

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT