2013 Healthiest Employers: Citizens Energy Group

Tom Harton
August 15, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

winner OR finalist 500-1,499 EMPLOYEES

logo-citizens-168.gifThe latest twist in Citizens Energy Group’s well-tested Healthy Citizens wellness program uses the same technology found in any smart phone.

The company is awaiting delivery of its first accelerometers, devices that take pedometers a step further. The accelerometer doesn’t just measure steps, it measures movement of all kinds, and it’s what Citizens will use to further monitor the collective activity level of its 1,200 employees.

With the data Citizens collects it can further fine-tune its 10-year-old wellness program, which, in partnership with Spectrum Health, offers a full menu of activities and education meant to make a difference in the lives of Citizens’ employees. Employees can use the results in conjunction with Spectrum health coaches to establish and reach individual goals.

Regardless of the offerings and incentives, employees come up with their own reasons for getting involved.

For Ann McIver, Citizens’ director of environmental stewardship, the motivator was her approaching 45th birthday.

She’s been with Citizens since late 2000 and has regularly participated in health screenings to get information about cholesterol, blood pressure and the like. But in January this year she decided to get more involved.

“I made a commitment to lose 45 pounds by my 45th birthday” in November, she said. McIver and a coworker formed a two-person team to participate in Citizens’ Biggest Loser weight-loss challenge. They were among 89 participants who safely lost a collective 625 pounds in eight weeks.

And McIver is one of 46 who signed up for a follow-up program, called Biggest Improver, in which employees are supported in their quest to keep the weight off. Those who meet their goals get a pair of walking or running shoes.

McIver’s personal goal is already met. She’s lost almost 50 pounds, and her November birthday is still months away. Now she’s involved in Citizens’ Healthy Peddler program. She’s ridden the equivalent of the 150 miles it takes to get to Hammond. Now she’s on her way to St. Louis.

She logs her miles, in part because she knows her health coach will be looking for the results. As for her ramped-up participation in Healthy Citizens, McIver said “I saw the program as a way to get the encouragement and motivation I needed.”

The decade-long process of changing Citizens’ wellness culture was hard work, and the success of the program is due to Citizens’ recognition that wellness isn’t a “one size fits all” proposition, said Russ Clemens, Citizens’ manager of compensation and benefits. Whether its Zumba classes, walking or biking programs or involvement in the Indiana Sports Corp. Corporate Challenge, Citizens prides itself on offering programs that get families involved and fit a variety of tastes and lifestyles.

Employees have responded: more than 95 percent expected to participate in this year’s health screenings. That’s up from 92 percent last year, when results showed that 16 percent of employees had reduced cholesterol, 19 percent had blood pressure improvements and tobacco use decreased 32 percent.

Citizens offers seven different corporate gym memberships, and 27 percent of employees take advantage of that program. Twenty percent of employees are actively engaged in a coaching program to improve their health. And in the last year, Citizens’ cost trend, average claims and cost per claim have all dropped for participants in on-site and telephonic health coaching.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.