Area home sales creep up after faltering in July

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home sales in central Indiana crept 3-percent higher in August as prices rose modestly and the inventory of available homes slipped.

Real estate agency F.C. Tucker Co. reported Monday morning that 2,415 sale agreements were reached in the nine-county metro area in August, a 3-percent bump from 2,344 homes in the same month last year.

The tiny increase was a relief for local industry watchers, after year-over-year sale agreements faltered in July for the first time in more than two years.

The U.S. housing market is showing signs of cooling as higher prices and interest rates conspire with shrinking inventory to slow sales, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Pending sales rose 2.5 percent in Marion County, from 1,005 in August 2012 to 1,030 in August 2013. Counties with the greatest percentage increases were Shelby, with a 75.7 percent rise (37 to 65 homes); Hancock, with a 22.4 percent jump (85 to 104 homes); and Johnson, with a 13.6 percent improvement (169 to 192 homes).

High-end powerhouse Hamilton County saw its pending sales dip 4.7 percent, from 508 homes to 484. Contracts also fell in pricey Boone County, tumbling 11 percent (91 to 81 homes).

Year-to-date, pending sales for central Indiana are up 18.6 percent compared with the first eight months of 2012.

Available homes for sale in the region dropped 9.4 percent in August 2013, with 11,965 homes on the market—1,242 fewer than in August 2012. Marion County’s inventory dropped 9.1 percent (5,867 homes to 5,331).

Boone County has the area’s highest average home price, year-to-date, at $256,019. That’s down a smidge—0.3 percent—from a year ago. The average home price in Hamilton County is up 3.9 percent to $250,299. The average sale price in Marion County rose 8.4 percent to $128,671.

There were three agreements in August for homes in the region priced above $2 million, according to Tucker. Another three were priced between $1 million and $2 million. Forty-four sold at prices between $500,000 and $1 million.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.