Emmis dials up improving sales, but profit slows

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. posted a 4-percent increase in revenue during its second fiscal quarter, but profit was lower due to higher legal expenses and employee retention costs.

The Indianapolis-based radio and publishing firm on Thursday reported a profit of $2.6 million, or 6 cents a share, compared to $38 million, or 98 cents a share, in the same quarter of 2012.

Much of the profit in that quarter last year stemmed from the 2012 sale of KXOS-FM in Los Angeles for $85.5 million, from which the company reported a gain from discontinued operations of $32.8 million.

Total revenue for the most recent quarter, which ended Aug. 31, hit $55 million, up from $52.9 million.

Emmis shares dropped 4.6 percent in late morning trading, to $2.25 each.

The owner of 21 radio stations, including WIBC-FM 93.1, said revenue from its radio operations rose 3.2 percent, to $41.3 million. That rate outpaced domestic average radio revenues that were about 1.5 percent, the company said.

Emmis’ publishing division had strong revenue growth in the quarter, rising nearly 6 percent to $13.7 million. That unit includes Indianapolis Monthly and similar publications in several major cities.

Operating income of $5.7 million was down 25 percent.

The company cited higher expenses for the quarter, which dragged on profit. They included employee compensation through Emmis' 2012 Retention Trust, which allocates company shares to employees as bonuses. It also included more than $1 million in legal costs during the quarter to fight a decision by the government of Hungary to award to another bidder the national radio license held by its subsidiary there.

The big news for Emmis during the quarter was the launch of NextRadio, an app Emmis developed that allows certain wireless phones to receive FM broadcast signals like a transistor radio. It debuted in September on some phone models sold by the Sprint wireless network.

Emmis has led the NextRadio industry initiative, with CEO Jeff Smulyan estimating it could eventually generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year in new revenue for radio broadcasters.

Currently, most cell phones in the U.S. can receive radio only through Internet-based radio streaming, which can eat into one’s data-plan minutes. NextRadio is coupled with an Emmis-developed system that also allows Sprint phone customers to receive song and station information, along with ads and special offers pushed to the phone’s video screen that correspond to ads playing at any given moment on the radio.

The NextRadio consortium of stations has agreed to pay Sprint $15 million a year for three years and to share with Sprint some of the revenue generated by the app.

Stations are paying Sprint $3.75 million in the first three months of the service, of which Emmis will pay $800,000. Seventy of the nation’s 75 largest radio groups have gotten aboard NextRadio, plus numerous small-market stations.

During an earnings call Thursday mornng, Smulyan said he expected the app to be installed on 300 million phones within four or five years.

“We’ll look back on this quarter as one that was integral in the transformation of the radio business,” Smulyan said.

He estimated that 10 million NextRadio-enabled phones could be in use within the first year.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.