IBJNews

WorkOne offices prepare for in-person meetings

Associated Press
October 12, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new Indiana law that requires people receiving unemployment benefits to show proof in person that they have been trying to find work is creating some uncertainty for the state's workforce development offices.

Greg Richmond, office manager for a WorkOne office in Anderson, said he's concerned about the number of people who might be coming through the office because of the law that took effect Oct. 1.

"Based on the month of July, a year ago, we would have seen 160 people. If we get that kind of response, it is going to be a lot of traffic," Richmond told The Herald Bulletin.

The new law is modeled after a federal measure and requires unemployed residents to attend an in-person meeting or risk losing their jobless benefits. The law is aimed in part at reducing unemployment fraud.

The state's Department of Workforce Development has begun notifying those who've received at least four weeks' worth of jobless benefits that they need to schedule a meeting at a local WorkOne office. The meetings begin Wednesday.

Joe Frank, spokesman for the Department of Workforce Development, said those visiting the WorkOne centers can have their resumes reviewed and get tips on interview techniques.

"You will have to show you have searched for three jobs," he said. "We are really going to dig into their work search and see if we can give them some pointers."

The in-person review of work searches is only required once and will help cut down on fraud, Frank said.

"If we see they are not doing a bona fide work search, then we can cut them off," Frank said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What a Joke
    Sorry IBJ, the article lacks depth. People receiving unemployment compensation are required to apply for employment a minimum of three times each week. The person filing for unemployment compensation must show proof that he/she applied for employment the previous week, provide the name of the company and a contact phone number at that specific company. I believe the one-on-one meetings are required once a person has received four weeks of unemployment compensation. I continue to wonder if employers that place job openings on the web are serious regarding the job openings they post. For example, St. Vincent Hospital and IU Health advertised numerous positions on the internet knowing full-well that 900+ employees were to be released by both healthcare providers. I question if WorkOne has the capacity to interview applicants, verify potential employer job offerings, and maintain internal records on each person applying for unemployment. Frankly, I would rather see funding applied toward the attraction of new jobs into Indiana, rather than herding applicants through the WorkOne Office once each month. Why not require a polygraph exam if they are that worried about filing fraud.
  • Sensible
    There was a time when drawing unemployment was something that, if circumstances forced you to do it, you didn't want anybody to know about it. Being "on the dole" had a negative stigma about it. Not anymore. I know people who never looked for anything, just filled out the forms based upon ads they saw in the paper. My kids are in their 20s and all of the jobs they have had have had online applications, followed by face-to-face interviews. Getting a job may be a challenge, but applying for one has never been easier. If it stops just one scammer I'm all for it.
  • Job Interveiws
    It seems to me that one day for an in-person meeting and one day to submit at least 3 online applications would STILL LEAVE AT LEAST 18 WORK DAYS PER MONTH to schedule an interview if offered a chance for employment. Maybe you don't want to work if you think one meeting a month is unreasonable.
  • susan
    They have to report every 4 weeks right?? Seems like plenty of time between these meetings to have more than 3 interviews
  • What next
    The lines will be 3 times longer now. You could spend all day in there trying to convince them you have been looking for 3 jobs. And applying for 3 jobs online has to be done by a certain day. When do the people have time to go on interviews if there are any offered?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT