IBJNews

IU assembling plan to 'disaster proof' its campuses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana University is creating a plan to seek federal aid to "disaster proof" its Bloomington, Indianapolis and regional campuses.

A goal of the plan is to allow the university to request Federal Emergency Management Agency funds directly instead of going through the county, as is the current policy.

Members of IU's Office of Emergency Management and Continuity and the Polis Center at IUPUI met recently to discuss the plan, which the university hopes to have approved and ready for FEMA's review by March. IU trustees also must sign off on the plan.

IU's emergency management team has reviewed the path of an F2 tornado that hit north of campus in 1973. If the storm had hit campus, more than 100 buildings could have been hit, and damage could have reached $1.3 billion, The Herald-Times reported.

Ken Long, assistant emergency management director for Bloomington's campus, said IU is interested in receiving funding to move utilities out of bottom floors to mitigate water issues during a flood. Other options would be to retrofit buildings and create better refuge from disasters, he said.

Those requests could be made sought independently of county requests under IU's proposal.

"The county can be separate (in applying for funding), so we can get things for each of us," Long said. "If we went within the county, it might lessen (the county's) chance of some of their projects getting approved."

Laura Danielson, a spokeswoman with the Polis Center, said that doesn't mean IU would break off from all county-generated FEMA requests.

"If there are funds that are more general, projects that could benefit the whole county, the county would go after (funding)," Danielson said. "If it's something the university uniquely wants to protect, like retrofitting a lab because it's got 30 years of research in it, then the university would go after that funding."

The plan being drafted only includes strategies, not actions to be taken at specific sites.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT