State outpaces nation in job creation; unemployment falls

 IBJ Staff
December 20, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Job numbers increased faster in Indiana in November than in any other state, the government reported Friday morning. The unemployment rate also fell 0.2 points, to 7.3 percent.

The state added a seasonally adjusted 25,200 nonfarm jobs—the third-largest figure in the nation—over October. The 0.9-percent increase was fastest in the nation.

"Today’s employment news in Indiana stuns the senses," Ball State University economist Mike Hicks said in an e-mailed statement. "Nearly one out of every eight jobs created nationally were created here in Indiana. The composition of jobs were also strong, with manufacturing, logistics and construction comprising the top three job gaining categories."
Leading Indiana’s job gains were trade, transportation and utilities, up 6,800 positions, and construction, up 4,800. Manufacturing added 4,800 jobs and professional and business services—a category that includes temporary jobs—was up 4,700 positions.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development pointed out that Indiana was responsible for nearly 13 percent of national private-sector job growth in November.

“November was a historic month of job growth in Indiana,” commissioner Scott B. Sanders said in a prepared statement. “It is encouraging that fewer Hoosiers are unemployed than in November of 2008, and the unemployment rate has dropped by more than a percentage point over the past few months. However, we need to keep the ball moving by strengthening Indiana’s pro-growth climate.”

The figures are preliminary, thus subject to adjustment.

Figures for the Indianapolis metro area were not immediately available.

With November’s gains, the state is within striking range of record employment.

The 2,980,300 jobs in November were 38,400 short of the record 3,018,700 set in May 2000.

November also is 12,800 short of the interim peak of 2,993,100 reached in June 2007—months before the Great Recession began.

Indiana’s jobless rate was lower than all surrounding states and 0.2 points above the U.S. average.

"These numbers are two-and-a-half times better than a 'very good' month in job creation," Hicks said. "While these numbers may be revised in coming months, this is once again evidence that Indiana is rebounding far better than the nation as a whole."





  • More jobs, less income
    It's interesting that everyone talks about increasing employment figures, but no one seems to spend some time at Stats Indiana or the St Louis Fed's Federal Reserve Economic Data. Maybe some other numbers need to be discussed to temper the exuberance. The employment numbers may be increasing, but the per capita income continues to decrease. More jobs, less money for those jobs.
  • And
    Out of curiosity, I sought out other articles on this report. Seems the IBJ decided to leave out Hicks' expectation that those numbers, regionally, will be revised downward and that other economists have a much more cautious interpretation, specifically concerning Indiana's reliance on tax cuts and manufacturing as growth drivers. So. I guess my theme here is educate yourselves.
  • Seriously
    All of you need to go look at the actual data. The monthly decline in Illinois, Michigan, Kentucky, and Indiana was identical at -0.2% with the total US decline being -0.3%. So, while this might be some kind of record here, it's regional and national, not something special that happened only in our state. Sorry, Dave and Evan.
  • Please
    Agreed w Jim F. For all you Pence/GOP praisers, what's been leading job growth is low-wage service sector job creation, which taxpayers subsidize...so these could be Wal-Mart jobs for all we know. And that's nothing to gloat about.
  • Underlying Cause of Increase Not Clear
    Wow! Most of the commenters are jumping to conclusions about who created these jobs and turning it into a Republican vs Democrat issue. How sad! Truth is, the article offers no analysis of the underlying reasons for the job growth nor does it discuss job losses during the month. I agree that Governors and Presidents don't create jobs but can set a proper tone. Lets see how the final numbers come out along with some analysis of what caused the job increases before we attribute it to political parties.
  • Not Really True
    Governors do not create private sector jobs, but they sign into law enactments of the legislature which make their states attractive to businesses which do create those jobs. Right to work is an example of legislation which has broken an aged union stranglehold and made Indiana more attractive than, say Illinois. Also, by managing the state in a fiscally responsible way, those same businesses see that they can grow in a state that has shy high taxes and is even then buried in debt that it can never repay. Pence is too new to deserve much credit. If a toast is to be made, it goes to the general Assembly and former Governor Daniels.
  • State Outpaces nation
    I think the way this works is that, when there is good news here, it's due to the wonderful Wizard of Ozbama and when there is bad news, its Pence's, Reagan's and GWB's fault!
  • Really?
    No sitting Indiana governor ever created a single private sector job while governor. Wise observers neither blame them when the economy tanks, nor credit them when the economy booms.
  • Hahahahah
    Good one dave :) Democrats will whine how those mean rich Republicans are taking away their rights and hurting the middle class by cutting their taxes......... Wonder why Democrats have basically no power in our state? Republican SuperMajority in the house and senate with a Republican Governor.
  • Wow
    Can't wait to hear the Democrats spin on this. "If we had a better Governor and more favorable legislature we would have created 100% of the jobs in the U.S." Maybe Glenda Ritz can help them craft their respones.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.