IBJNews

NEWSMAKERS: Joe Swedish

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
More
Stories
ExactTarget sells for eye-popping<br />$2.5 billion City finally lands development for<br />Market Square Employers prep for Obamacare Cultural Trail opens, fuels development Wishard morphs into Eskenazi Hospital Apartment craze shows no signs<br />of slowing Whole Foods-anchored project<br />causes stir in Broad Ripple Courtroom drama features local names IMS CEO makes big moves, wins state aid Indy scores pro soccer team City makes list of finalists to host 2018<br />Super Bowl


Newsmakers
2013 NEWSMAKER: Scott Dorsey 2013 NEWSMAKER: Andrew Luck 2013 Newsmakers: Tony Bennett
                              &<br />Glenda Ritz 2013 NEWSMAKER: Mitch Daniels 2013 NEWSMAKER: Joe Swedish

When Joe Swedish was named the next CEO of WellPoint Inc., investors frowned.

How could a lifetime hospital executive be the right person to lead the Indianapolis-based insurance giant through the implementation of Obamacare, one of the most uncertain times in the company’s history?

Swedish Swedish

“WellPoint had a lay-up, but the board chose to increase the degree of difficulty instead,” Citigroup analyst Carl McDonald told investors.

But pretty soon, investors didn’t care. Swedish sounded capable enough in his presentations to investors, who had soured on his predecessor, Angela Braly, after repeated miscues.

“WellPoint now has an adult in the room,” said Rob Medway, a partner at Royal Capital Management LLC, which holds a stake in WellPoint, after listening to Swedish talk to investors at a conference.

It also helped that the markets overall fell back in love with health insurance stocks. From March 25, the day Swedish took the helm, until Dec. 18, WellPoint’s shares rose 39 percent.

That was the second-best performance among the five largest health insurers, behind only Louisville-based Humana Inc. The major health insurers far outpaced the Standard & Poor’s 500 index in 2013.

Swedish benefited from improvements made by WellPoint’s lead attorney, John Cannon, who served as interim CEO after Braly’s departure in August 2012.

That positioned WellPoint to post better-than-expected profits this year, which were also helped by slower-than-expected rises in overall health care spending. WellPoint’s profits during the first three quarters of the year totaled $656 million, down 5 percent from the same period a year earlier.

Swedish is bullish on Obamacare. While the law will pinch WellPoint’s profit margins, he predicted the law’s subsidization of health insurance will send WellPoint’s revenue soaring to $90 billion in 2016.

—J.K. Wall

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT