Century-old Mass Ave landmark changes hands

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The historic Marott Center at the foot of downtown's Massachusetts Avenue has a new owner.

marott_center_15colThe five-story Marott Center, renovated in 1985, has been assessed at $1.5 million. (IBJ Photo/Scott Olson)

Local real estate firm Gershman Partners said Tuesday that it bought the building and an adjacent 90-space parking lot for an undisclosed price. The assessed value of the five-story office complex is $1.5 million, according to the Marion County Assessor.

George Rubin and Elliott Levin, principals of the Rubin & Levin PC law firm, had owned the building since 1984. Rubin recently announced that he was retiring from the firm.

Rubin & Levin is located in the 52,000-square-foot Marott Center at 342 Mass Ave. and will remain a tenant along with Walgreens and F.C. Tucker Co., Gershman said.

“We appreciate that we have been entrusted to carry on the heritage and tradition of this great building,” Eric Gershman, principal and co-founder of Gershman Partners, said in a prepared statement. “We look forward to maintaining the historic feel while ensuring its place as an anchor of the Mass Ave District.”

The Marott Center, which sits on the same block as Stout’s Shoes and the 3 Mass condominium project, was built in 1906 as one of the first multi-level department stores in Indiana. Restored in 1985 by Rubin and Levin, it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Indianapolis-based Gershman specializes in the development and acquisition of commercial properties. The company, formerly known as Gershman Brown Crowley Inc., changed its name last month following the departure of partner Tom Crowley, who launched T.M. Crowley & Associates.


  • Agree with JWH and Bark
    That surface lot NE of the building seems like it would be a great place for development. That intersection of Mass Ave is always bustling between the Marsh, Starbucks, and the many independent retail stores and bars/restaurants on the block. Foot traffic here is very high and it seems like a restaurant would do very well in that spot. While there are plenty of apartments being built downtown and around the Mass Ave area, there are a lot of people who want to live ON Mass Ave (the new development around the Barton tower doesn't really appeal at all to these types of people). It seems that the vacancies in apartments on Mass Ave are filled much more quickly than those even just a block away from the avenue.
  • Ahead of the curve
    Mass Ave is only Mass Ave today because of the vision of Rubin in 1985 to restore this property.
  • Barkin'
    ...mad ain't ya, and not too bright...I'm sure both Rubin and Levin have more brainpower in their little toes than you have in your entire empty head
  • Concur with rwh
    Way too much private surface parking on/near Mass. Way too much ground level office space also. Good to see buildings changing hands so geezers with poor development sense can stop holding up progress.
    • Adjacnet parking Lot
      It would be nice for them or someone else to develop the adjacent parking lot. This block has too much surface parking. Infill development is needed. What a great location to develop.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Now if he'd just stay there...

      2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

      3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

      4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

      5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.