IBJNews

21-acre Greenwood tract marketed for apartment development

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A 21-acre site in Greenwood where a high-profile local developer once planned to build condominiums is back on the market and repackaged as land best suited for apartments.

J. Greg Allen owned the property south of Smith Valley Road and east of State Road 135 but handed it back to the bank when demand for condominiums crashed with the housing market, said Ross Reller, senior vice president and director of land services for Colliers International.

Reller is marketing the site for BMO Harris, the bank that took possession of the land from Allen. The property is listed at nearly $1.4 million, or $63,500 per acre.

“It’s going to be a great site for market-rate apartments,” Reller said. “The suburbs have a good, healthy market for apartments, although a lot of new projects have started.”

greg allen greenwood tract 15colMuch of the apartment-development activity is occurring in downtown Indianapolis, where several projects have either recently been completed or are under construction, pushing downtown's population to new heights. Demand also is strong in the northern suburbs, such as Carmel and Zionsville, where higher rents can support market-rate projects.

At the Whitestown-Zionsville border, luxury apartment developer Watermark Residential has started on a $23 million multifamily community. Dubbed The Villas by Watermark, the 24-building complex will have 266 living units—a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments—plus a pool, clubhouse and other amenities.

The 19-acre community is on the south side of Whitestown Parkway, east of County Road 700 East and west of M/I Homes’ Maple Grove neighborhood.

Developers need high density, between 12 to 15 units an acre, to make a project work, and that’s typically not found in Greenwood’s zoning regulations, said George Tikijian of the Tikijian Associates apartment brokerage. He said Greenwood's lower density could pose problems for Reller as he markets the property.

“There really hasn’t been anything built down there in years,” he said. “The most recent property [built] is quite a bit south [near Whiteland] and has struggled to lease up. But that location is inferior to this site.”

Because the parcel Reller is listing is zoned for unlimited density, actual density for a project likely would be determined through approval of the site plan. He thinks allowing 12 to 15 units per acre would be reasonable.

Reller said he has seen a lot of interest in the property but has not received an offer. He said it might take a developer six months to make a formal offer after expressing interest.

“What we’re asking buyers to do is as much of the preliminary due diligence as possible up front prior to writing an offer so we know we have someone who is ready, willing and able,” Reller said.

Allen did not return a phone call seeking comment on the Greenwood property.

Allen redeveloped the $14 million downtown Indianapolis Allen Plaza at Virginia Avenue and Pennsylvania Street. The project, completed in 2009, includes 31 condo units in addition to office and retail space.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Apartments not needed
    This area of Center Grove has already seen enough development of apartments. I would hope before anymore are built, someone looks at the occupancy of the other apartments along 135 just to the south of Smith Valley Rd.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT