IBJNews

Simon posts strong quarter as mall occupancy strengthens

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping-mall owner, reported an 8.1-percent increase in fourth-quarter funds from operations as retailer demand for space in outlet centers climbed.

FFO, which gauges a property company’s ability to generate cash, rose to $894.8 million, or $2.47 a share, from $827.4 million, or $2.29, a year earlier, the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust said Friday morning.

The average of 22 analyst estimates was $2.43 a share, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Simon declared a $1.25 per share dividend, up from $1.20 for the previous three months and 8.7 percent more than a year earlier.

Simon is benefiting as retailers seek space in outlet centers, where brand-name items are sold at a discount.

Overall, occupancy in its malls climbed to 96.1 percent in December from 95.3 percent at the end of 2012 as total sales per square foot increased from $568 to $582. Rents also grew, to $42.34 per square foot in the fourth quarter from $40.73 in the year-ago period.

Profit increased 21 percent, to $381.6 million, or $1.23 per share, compared with $315.4 million, or $1.01 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Quarterly revenue rose 5 percent, to $1.4 billion.

“This was an excellent quarter and year for Simon Property Group, capped off by our 20th anniversary as a public company in December,” Simon CEO David Simon said in a prepared statement. “We produced strong financial and operating results in the fourth quarter, led by 5.5-percent growth in comparable property net operating income for our U.S. malls and premium outlets."

For the entire year, Simon reported FFO of $3.2 billion, or $8.85 per share, compared with $2.9 billion, or $7.98 per share, in 2012. The company forecast 2014 FFO per share in the range of $9.50 to $9.60.

Net income in 2013 fell slightly, to $1.3 billion, or $4.24 per share, compared with $1.4 billion,  or $4.72, in the prior year. Results for 2012 include non-cash net gains from acquisitions and dispositions of $1.41 per share.

Revenue in 2013 grew 5.9 percent, to $5.2 billion.

In December, Simon announced that it will spin off all of its strip centers and 44 smaller malls into a separate public company. The transaction should be completed in the second quarter, Simon said.

Simon shares rose 2.9 percent in premarket trading, to $155 each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Repay the people
    Well now Simon can repay Indianapolis the 400 million we have given them for the Circle Center Mall

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT