IBJNews

Hamilton County considering solar energy for public buildings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hamilton County might soon join the growing ranks of large utility users looking to hedge against rising prices by producing some of their own power.

County commissioners are working with local energy consultant Johnson Melloh Solutions to come up with a plan to put rooftop solar panels on public property including the courthouse and jail, generating savings along with electricity.

solarfarm-2-1col.jpg Indianapolis International Airport property is home to 44,128 solar panels. (IBJ photo/Eric Learned)

“It mitigates the risk of increasing utility costs,” said Commissioner Mark Heirbrandt, who works as an energy-efficiency and water-treatment consultant.

Although still modest in comparison to our coastal cousins, Indiana’s electric rates are expected to climb 32 percent over the next decade, according to a December report from the State Utility Forecasting Group at Purdue University.

Solar prices, meanwhile, have dropped by about half in the past five years, spurring more interest from large users like Hamilton County.

“It’s definitely on the upswing here,” said Bill Hutzel, a professor of mechanical engineering technology at Purdue who specializes in high-performance buildings.

solar-numbers.gifCoal-rich Indiana is still playing catch-up compared with some states, but observers expect solar initiatives to proliferate as the pricing trends continue.

Johnson Melloh Solutions has worked with public and private clients on a range of energy-saving projects since spinning off from Indianapolis-based mechanical contractor Johnson Melloh Inc. in 2009. Its clients—mostly school corporations and municipalities—have embraced solar power in particular.

Since adding renewable energy to its portfolio four years ago, the company has developed 62 solar projects with a total capacity of 23 megawatts. It installed a 108-kilowatt solar farm on top of the city’s Department of Public Works building at 1737 S. West St., for example, and a small solar array on the roof of Cathedral High School.

“We’re seeing a shift in the marketplace,” Chief Operating Officer Bob McKinney said.

Even traditional providers like Indianapolis Power & Light are exploring the possibilities. IPL agreed to buy up to 100 megawatts of electricity from alternative sources in its service territory as part of its Renewable Energy Production initiative. So far, 23 of the 30 projects are operational, IPL spokeswoman Brandi Davis-Handy said.

The highest profile is the massive solar farm at Indianapolis International Airport. Commissioned in October, its 44,128 panels are capable of producing enough energy to power more than 1,800 average homes for a year. A second phase also is planned.

Johnson Melloh Solutions and Carmel-based Telamon Corp. joined forces with other partners on the airport solar farm, which leaders hope will serve as a model for others considering renewable energy.

In the two years since Johnson Melloh installed a small solar array on a portion of Telamon’s roof, the demonstration project has produced more than 129 megawatt hours of electricity—the equivalent of 22 tons of coal, according to the company’s monitoring website.

While residential and commercial users like Telamon (and Hamilton County) typically produce only enough power for their own use, utility-scale installations like the IND Solar Farm sell power to providers like IPL.

‘Game is changing’

Nationwide, 34 states require a portion of electric generation to come from renewable-energy sources like solar and wind, said Vincent Liu, executive vice president of Telamon’s Energy Solutions division. Indiana is not among them. Other states also offer financial incentives.

Indiana has been slower to embrace renewable energy because the state’s coal-rich heritage has kept utility rates relatively low, said Purdue’s Hutzel. But tighter environmental standards and new coal-fired construction are driving up costs, he said, and federal assistance is available for some projects.

Purdue researchers are working with a consortium of manufacturers—including the likes of John Deere—interested in a “microgrid” of rooftop solar arrays to reduce factories’ electric load during peak demand, Hutzel said. In addition to a standard per-kilowatt-hour-charge, large users pay a premium for heavy use.

“It may not pay dividends this year, but they recognize the game is changing,” he said. “And they want to be prepared.”

Johnson Melloh doesn’t steer all its clients straight to solar. Behavior modification (turning off lights, turning down heat) comes first, followed by equipment and facility upgrades that boost efficiency.

“We wanted to look long term,” McKinney said. “It’s about energy diversification, not replacement. It’s simply a hedge against rising electric rates.”

He credits several factors for the solar industry’s recent resurgence after a false start during the Carter administration: Products are more efficient, prices have dropped “phenomenally”—from almost $6 per kilowatt hour in 2010 to about $2.15 now—and financing is readily available.

The so-called “levelized cost” of solar energy—the total cost of installing and maintaining a system, divided by its expected power output—comes out to an average of 9 cents to 11 cents per kilowatt hour, McKinney said. By comparison, traditional electric systems cost 7 cents to 9 cents per kilowatt hour.

Locking in prices

Being able to lock in a price for the 25-year life span of the solar panels is another advantage, McKinney said, particularly for the public entities Johnson Melloh serves.

“That’s good for our clients, because they can budget for that,” he said. “It’s hard to budget for a 6-percent increase one year and a 12-percent increase the next year. … [With another source of energy], they can take control of some of that.”

Early adopters like the city of Indianapolis, which installed solar panels at its City-County Building and on top of two Department of Public Works facilities, are leading by example, McKinney said.

Indianapolis’ energy initiative started after Mayor Greg Ballard took office in 2008; the city set out to make 61 city-owned buildings more efficient, with $18 million in upgrades to lighting, HVAC equipment and building controls.

Heibrandt Heirbrandt

Hamilton County has similar ambitions. Officials have been working to cut utility costs for years as the county adjusts to state tax caps and other funding challenges. The effort got a dedicated cheerleader last year, when Heirbrandt joined the board.

LED lighting and better control systems were relatively quick fixes. Next up is $1.3 million in equipment upgrades included in a series of bond issues the county approved last year to clear a backlog of projects.

Rather than refurbish the 21-year-old Government Center chillers, for example, crews will replace them with energy-efficient air compressors. The all-electric building also will get natural gas service.

While they’re working on those projects, contractors will prepare the roof for a planned building expansion and the possible solar installation.

At the county’s request, the initial proposal called for installing solar panels on all 31 public buildings. An investment of $13 million would produce utility savings of about $33 million over 25 years, Commissioner Steve Dillinger said during his State of the County address in January.

Commissioners have since asked the energy consultant to scale back the project to about half that size, Heirbrandt said. A revised proposal is expected this month.

Building and Grounds chief Steve Wood is enthusiastic about the energy initiative, even though it means more work for him and his staff. The financial return is undeniable—simple changes like the LED lighting already have resulted in more than $400,000 in savings—but the environmental impact also is key.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT