IBJNews

Indiana education panel approves new school standards

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A panel of Indiana business and education leaders were met with boos and jeers from attendees after they voted overwhelmingly Monday to support new math and English standards set to replace the Common Core curriculum in classrooms this fall.

Indiana was one of the first of 45 states to adopt the national benchmarks in Common Core in 2010 in an effort to create consistently high standards across state lines. The adoption sped through under former Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, and it wasn't until later that opponents criticized the lack of local input.

The legislature passed a bill in 2013 pausing the standards' implementation, and Pence signed legislation in March to make Indiana the first state to formally abandon them. Indiana is blazing ahead of other states with interest in ditching Common Core. About 100 bills have been introduced this year to repeal or pause the use of it in classrooms, according to the National Council of State Legislatures.

State law requires Indiana to adopt "the best standards in the United States" by July.

The approval from the Education Roundtable — co-chaired by Pence and Superintendent for Public Instruction Glenda Ritz and flushed with lawmakers, business leaders and education officials — means the standards passed one of the last hurdles before adoption. They will go before the State Board of Education on April 28 for final approval.

Members voted 21-2 in favor of the English benchmarks with one member abstaining. The math standards were approved 21-3.

Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruction Danielle Shockey said a supplemental glossary with definitions of what critics called vague terms in the standards will be available for interested school corporations, along with recommended reading lists numerous national evaluators requested.

Several Roundtable members said developing tests to accurately assess the standards is a pressing concern considering school ratings and teacher evaluations both are tied to testing.

A cost analysis by the Legislative Services Agency estimates the transition to new standards could cost the state about $10.5 million next school year, $23-32 million in 2015-2016 and $17-26 million annually beginning in the 2016-2017 school year.

Despite the Roundtable's strong vote in support of the guidelines, some expert evaluators and members of Hoosiers Against Common Core were unconvinced the planned replacement for the national standards are much different.

Analysis of earlier drafts of the English standards for sixth through 12th grade show about 90 percent were either directly from Common Core or edited versions of those standards. Those benchmarks were used as a baseline to craft the proposed standards, along with previous standards in place in Indiana.

Education officials last week said no formal analysis is planned to evaluate how much of Common Core is left in the final draft.

About 200 people filled a Statehouse hallway before the Roundtable meeting to hear Terrence Moore — an assistant professor of history from Hillsdale College who opposes Common Core and reviewed an earlier draft of the standards.

"If these standards were to come to me as a paper, I would put an F on it and write one word: plagiarism," Moore said. "They want us to believe these are entirely new standards. Well, they're not."

One audience member watching the Education Roundtable meeting let out a chuckle when the governor repeated his call for "uncommonly high" benchmarks written "by Hoosiers, for Hoosiers." His praise for the transparency of the evaluation — there were three public hearings and more than 2,000 comments submitted online on the first draft — brought laughter.

Many held up signs that read, "Governor Pence, are you listening?"

State Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, was one of the few who voted against the draft. He declined to comment on why he opposes those standards.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Datamining...
    If you use PowerSchool to view your child's progress, Pearson has all that data, NOW. Yes, let's stop pouring taxpayer $ in to a system which needs to focus on basic teaching our children NON-CommonCore curriculum.
  • The head of the nail has been struck
    Excellent Response!!! Common Core has a dirty little secret...data collection. There are four hundred points of data being collected, monitored and stored on every child in the American education system. Monitoring devices are being implemented in our children's classrooms. All of this is being done under the guise of education reform. The State Longitudinal Database System, is a comprehensive database compiled on each child. This data is not aggregate data, it is linked specifically to the child. Data that is collected will follow the child through to their adult years and beyond. In fact, that is the purpose of the SLDS, to provide a database that “grows” along with the child into their career years. The Workforce Data Quality Initiative's Mission Statement from the United States Department of Labor's website reads: "The long-term Workforce Data Quality Initiative and SLDS goal for States is to use their longitudinal data systems to follow individuals through school and into and through their work life." "Enable workforce data to be matched with education data to ultimately create longitudinal data systems with individual-level information beginning with pre-kindergarten through post-secondary schooling all the way through entry and sustained participation in the workforce and employment services system." The SLDS has been implemented nationwide in each state. It became fully operational in 2012. The funding for the SLDS was from the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act in 2009. Oregon was awarded $10.5 million to create our SLDS.
  • Who Are We Kidding...
    Common Core's True Purpose....not about education or school evaluations but has a dirty little secret...data collection. There are four hundred points of data being collected, monitored and stored on every child in the American education system. Monitoring devices are being implemented in our children's classrooms. All of this is being done under the guise of education reform. The State Longitudinal Database System, is a comprehensive database compiled on each child. This data is not aggregate data, it is linked specifically to the child. Data that is collected will follow the child through to their adult years and beyond. In fact, that is the purpose of the SLDS, to provide a database that “grows” along with the child into their career years. The Workforce Data Quality Initiative's Mission Statement from the United States Department of Labor's website reads: "The long-term Workforce Data Quality Initiative and SLDS goal for States is to use their longitudinal data systems to follow individuals through school and into and through their work life." "Enable workforce data to be matched with education data to ultimately create longitudinal data systems with individual-level information beginning with pre-kindergarten through post-secondary schooling all the way through entry and sustained participation in the workforce and employment services system." The SLDS has been implemented nationwide in each state. It became fully operational in 2012.
  • Indiana Failed Students Again
    We currently send our kids to a Catholic school. When Common Core started over 50% of the parents were disappointed in the curriculum. The common standards the federal government put in place, dummy down schools who currently exceed state and national standards. It did for our school. I am very sad to see Indiana did not dump the Common Core altogether. We were given hope only to be disappointed by government re-branding common core or as I read somewhere recently commie crap. Indiana step it up and show the state government we are better than common core and our kids deserve more.
  • Common Failure
    Sorry Mike, but Common Core and high standards are on opposite sides of the aisle. We see consultants and policy makers creating guidelines and material where there should be parents and teachers. Common Core is absolutely failing our kids and our educational system. Indiana gets press as state to move away from the failure that is Common Core, yet instead all they did was rewrite the same principals and standards. WHATS WRONG WITH THE CORE>>> One: Standards shouldn’t be attached to school subjects, but to the qualities of mind it’s hoped the study of school subjects promotes. Subjects are mere tools, just as scalpels, acetylene torches, and transits are tools. Surgeons, welders, surveyors — and teachers — should be held accountable for the quality of what they produce, not how they produce it. Two: The world changes. The future is indiscernible. Clinging to a static strategy in a dynamic world may be comfortable, even comforting, but it’s a Titanic-deck-chair exercise. Three: The Common Core Standards assume that what kids need to know is covered by one or another of the traditional core subjects. In fact, the unexplored intellectual terrain lying between and beyond those familiar fields of study is vast, expands by the hour, and will go in directions no one can predict. Four: So much orchestrated attention is being showered on the Common Core Standards, the main reason for poor student performance is being ignored—a level of childhood poverty the consequences of which no amount of schooling can effectively counter. Five: The Common Core kills innovation. When it’s the only game in town, it’s the only game in town. Six: The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence (and waste boatloads of money). Seven: The word “standards” gets an approving nod from the public (and from most educators) because it means “performance that meets a standard.” However, the word also means “like everybody else,” and standardizing minds is what the Standards try to do. Common Core Standards fans sell the first meaning; the Standards deliver the second meaning. Standardized minds are about as far out of sync with deep-seated American values as it’s possible to get. Eight: The Common Core Standards’ stated aim — “success in college and careers”— is at best pedestrian, at worst an affront. The young should be exploring the potentials of humanness.
    • Why care?
      Since Having high educational standards is the goal, who cares if the standards are the same ones stated in Common Core? Seems the only reason to go through the $25 million annual exercise is to put Hoosier in the title. We could be putting that money into supporting the high standards already present in Common Core by paying great salaries to have great teachers and great schools. The cost of political theatrics is mind boggling.
    • Indiana = amateur government
      Having gotten a mark for plagiarism in the 3rd grade, the memory is vivid and the lesson was learned. Why are our leaders pretending we don't notice the plagiarism, lies, and cover up? Do they really think we're all that stupid? Yes, yes they do. :(

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

      2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

      3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

      4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

      5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

      ADVERTISEMENT