IBJNews

Removing false homestead exemptions to yield bonanza

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When this spring's tax bills are collected, Marion County stands to receive tens of millions of dollars from property owners who’ve been claiming false homestead deductions.

The property-tax billing cycle that ends May 12 is the first to reflect the enforcement effort that kicked off with a 2009 state law requiring property owners to verify their eligibility for the deduction, which applies only to primary residences.

In Marion County, Auditor Billie Breaux removed the deduction from about 34,000 parcels for the 2014 tax bills, homestead verification specialist Stephanie Miller said.

Many of those deductions were removed because the property owner failed to complete and send back a pink-colored verification form, Miller said. The auditor’s office has been flooded with calls, and Marion County might end up correcting as many as 3,600 tax bills, she said.

After sending out multiple notices over four years, Miller believes most of those who lost their deductions are homestead scofflaws.

“I would imagine, the overwhelming majority of these, they don’t qualify,” she said.

Tax bills could double or triple, depending on the actual use of the property. The maximum tax rate on primary residences is 1 percent of assessed value, but it’s 2 percent on rentals and 3 percent on commercial property.

Under the law, those former homesteads also can be subject to three years of back taxes. The Marion County auditor’s office already has billed back taxes on about 1,000 parcels and collected about $3.1 million, Miller said.

The average three-year bill has been about $3,200, Miller said. If the same average applies to the final batch of ineligible homesteads, the county could collect $97 million.

The rate of property owners misusing the homestead deduction has been especially high in Marion and Allen counties, said Dawn Coverdale,  the president of the Indiana County Auditors’ Association.

Marion County has more than about 220,000 homestead properties, so the 34,000 that were removed represents 15 percent.

In Hamilton County, where Coverdale serves as auditor, the deduction was removed from 3,800 parcels, or 4.6 percent, of the county’s 82,000 homesteads.

The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance, which maintains a database of homestead deduction information, does not know how many parcels lost deductions as a result of the verification and enforcement process, spokeswoman Jenny Banks said.

The law required property owners to submit Social Security and driver’s license information so that auditors could figure out whether one person was claiming deductions on multiple properties. The DLGF database contained only a homeowner’s name and address, so multiple homesteads appeared to belong to different property owners with the same name.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • "Honest Homeowners?"
    My mother (age 85) is losing her deduction because the home she purchased 25 years ago is now being considered a duplex due to the fact that it has only an outdoor access to the upstairs. In fact, she has never rented the upstairs out, and I currently live there and have for 15 years. Before that, my sister. This is a family residence. Is Mom breaking the law? Because if she is, the City is the real criminal here, IMO.
  • money grab
    Undoubtedly there are some who are no longer claiming an illegitimate homestead. There are thousands more who are entitled to the exemption but got a tax bill that's three times as high as it was before because they were unaware that they were required to refile.
  • Now that they're using basic computer tools
    Dose this mean we can stop having to "re-apply" for the homestead exemption periodically? Such a bureaucratic maneuver is no longer needed to "detect double-dippers," so at this point the only function it appears to fill is shafting unsavvy homeowners into a situation where their property tax bills double magically one year if they don't get the letter/don't understand what it means.
  • Honesty
    Agree with dishonest "homeowners". A duplex across the street owned by a LAWYER claims he lives in it but rents both sides to IUPUI students for a small fortune.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT