IBJNews

Zionsville, Perry Township move toward consolidation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Zionsville could remain a town and gain an elected mayor if residents approve a government reorganization plan that’s speeding toward a November vote.

Town Council members voted 6-1 on Monday to keep working on the plan to join forces with Perry Township in southeastern Boone County. Township officials unanimously adopted a similar measure last week.

A draft proposal calls for bringing about 1,100 residents and 20 square miles of Perry Township property into the town, eliminating a layer of government and delivering services more efficiently.

Because it’s being handled as a reorganization rather than an annexation, the move would allow Zionsville to shift elected officials’ responsibilities, adding a mayor as the town’s chief executive. The Town Council would retain legislative duties.

It’s a natural next step for the growing community, Council President Jeff Papa said Monday, helping it compete with its suburban neighbors without making the “emotional” leap from town to city.

Zionsville was the first community in the state to take advantage of Indiana’s Government Modernization Act in 2010, completing a merger with Union and Eagle townships that added 12,000 residents and 50 square miles of mostly rural territory.

The town now has a population of about 25,000.

If officials can iron out the details of the Perry Township deal in time to meet an end-of-month deadline, the new reorganization plan would be on the November ballot. The changes would take effect Jan. 1 if a majority of voters approved the measure.

Residents wouldn’t elect a mayor until the regular election cycle in 2015, however. The preliminary proposal calls for the council to appoint a member to hold the office on an interim basis, leading the reorganization efforts.

The interim mayor would not be eligible to run in the first mayoral election.

Supporters say the town needs a full-time executive empowered to make decisions on its behalf. Currently, appointed Town Manager Ed Mitro oversees day-to-day affairs at the direction of the part-time council.

Bringing in Perry Township would produce about $2.5 million in revenue for the town, according to a preliminary fiscal analysis, without many more expenses. Boone County takes care of roads and public safety in Zionsville’s rural districts, Papa said, keeping costs—and the resulting tax burden—relatively low.

“There’s a slight dollar benefit, but that’s not the aim of this,” Papa said. “These people are our neighbors and they want to do this.”

Although the area is largely agricultural now, suburban growth patterns suggest the township will be developed eventually. Reorganizing now eliminates the risk of forced annexation by another municipality later.

Councilor Tom Schuler played devil’s advocate, questioning the proposal and the behind-the-scenes process that got the reorganization talks started. He cast the lone “no” vote on a pair of resolutions advancing the plan.

“What are the benefits to the people who elected us to office?”  he asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Efficiency?
    "A draft proposal calls for bringing about 1,100 residents and 20 square miles of Perry Township property into the town, eliminating a layer of government and delivering services more efficiently." Yet, ~9 paragraphs later, "Bringing in Perry Township would produce about $2.5 million in revenue for the town, according to a preliminary fiscal analysis, without many more expenses. Boone County takes care of roads and public safety in Zionsville’s rural districts, Papa said, keeping costs—and the resulting tax burden—relatively low." Admittedly, I'm new to this conversation, however, I'm curious as to what the "more efficient" services would be for Perry Twp residents if everything is still being handled by Boone County? A separate article talked about additional funds for Perry Twp Volunteer Fire Department, but they'd still be volunteer if I'm not mistaken. No improved efficiency there - just more money?
  • Perry in Boone
    We are not talking about the Perry Twp. on the south side. There is a Perry Twp. that is the majority of Whitestown in Boone Co. It includes parts of Fayette, GCI, Anson, etc.
  • Who'll benefit
    “What are the benefits to the people who elected us to office?” Do you mean the developers and other big contributors to the current Council who benefit big time from TIF monies and other government hand outs for the rich and well connected? I'm sure they'll do just fine.
  • Response
    Some of you really need to learn how to put two and two together. Obviously the Perry Township in Indianapolis is nowhere near Zionsville, and even if it was, they aren't in the same county. I guess that's too much to ask for most internet readers, though.
    • Agreed
      There are also numerous Center Townships in Indiana, wanna guess what part of the county those are located in? I'm not really sure how Marion County's Perry Township could consolidate into anything, given that Unigov basically took care of that. I would wonder if the far reaches of the township would be too far from the center of Zionsville.
    • Unique Township Names
      Most Indiana township names are repeats. 25 Washingtons, Adams (10), Jefferson (28), Madison (14), Monroe (16), Jackson (47), Van Buren (11), Harrison (24), Clay (17), Center (25), and so on. We are an original bunch.
      • I Guess...
        there is a Perry Township in Boone County and Marion County? That is confusing for the state of Indiana. They should not repeat Township names in the state.
      • Perry
        I am confused. I thought Perry Township was on the south side of Indianapolis?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

      2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

      3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

      4. Send them back NOW.

      5. deport now

      ADVERTISEMENT