MARCUS: Economic slump inspires platitudes galore

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

In a private room of a restaurant at lunchtime, a dozen self-anointed economic experts gather. They drink and talk.

“Well,” says the stout woman in a Hillary-inspired suit. “I may not be an economist, but I can tell you that this stimulus package will not work. Spending money is never the answer.”

“Right,” replies the lean woman in a Michelle-inspired dress. “I’m surely no economist, but I know America is not globally competitive. We need to lower taxes and create a more business-friendly environment.”

“Above all,” says a distinguished-looking man wearing Sarah-styled spectacles, “we must cut outrageous wages and benefits. This new, higher minimum wage will only result in more outsourcing and more unemployment.”

“Hmm,” I say to myself, “these people know a litany of complaints but not the reality of our economy. If the problem is that consumers and businesses are not spending because banks aren’t lending, then government making it easier for banks to lend and consumers to spend is a good thing. The stimulus plan is right on target.

“And,” I continue in conversation with my gin and tonic, “the U.S. does not have high taxes relative to what we get for those taxes nor are we burdened with excessive regulation. In fact, an argument could be made that our taxes are too low, our services inadequate, and our businesses insufficiently regulated.”

“I tell you,” says a young professorial type, “our current standard of living can no longer be justified given our collective productivity. We must return to the free market with fewer controls so that more jobs can be created here.”

“Well-said, young fellow,” bellows a pillar of the community. “Drop around to my foundation and let’s see if we can get you a grant to flesh out your ideas.”

“Flush out would be more like it,” I say to myself. “Collective productivity is a great phrase. What’s the productivity of casinos, whether they are in Las Vegas or on Wall Street? How many executives, sports figures, or professors have proven productivity that validates their wages? Just how free is the free market when most industries have substantial barriers to entry?”

“Inflation,” says the stout woman.

“Debt,” says the lean woman.

“Deflation,” says the distinguished-looking gentleman.

“All that and stagnation,” says the professorial guy.

“Socialism,” says the community pillar.

“Yet we must do something sensible about health care,” admits the stout woman.

“Our infrastructure needs to be modernized,” the lean woman says.

“The environment demands our attention,” says the distinguished man.

“Much improvement is needed in education and retraining,” the professorial guy announces.

“My concern is the future of my children,” the lean woman says. “How will they do in the global economy unless they learn more in the classroom?”

“I’m worried about protecting my savings for my retirement,” the stout woman confides, “because health care costs could eat up everything I have.”

“If we have another stock market crash, there won’t be any value to your retirement savings,” the lean woman says.

“Only the free market can give us the solutions we need,” the pillar says. “That’s why I say, ‘Let’s look back to our best times—the late 19th century—when we had tariffs to protect our industry and little government regulation. The unions were insignificant and America was a magnet for capital investment.”

“Careful now,” says the professorial chap. “We can’t have the flood of immigrants that we had then. In the late 1800s, America had booming industries and plenty of resources to absorb foreign labor, but today is another story.”

“Energy independence,” declares the distinguished gentleman.

I drift toward the bar for a refill. A nation that settles for platitudes rather than pursuing policies is in deep trouble.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.             



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.